Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e240795. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0795.
Traumatic injury is a leading cause of hospitalization among people experiencing homelessness. However, hospital course among this population is unknown.
To evaluate whether homelessness was associated with increased morbidity and length of stay (LOS) after hospitalization for traumatic injury and whether associations between homelessness and LOS were moderated by age and/or Injury Severity Score (ISS).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Programs (TQP) included patients 18 years or older who were hospitalized after an injury and discharged alive from 787 hospitals in North America from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018. People experiencing homelessness were propensity matched to housed patients for hospital, sex, insurance type, comorbidity, injury mechanism type, injury body region, and Glasgow Coma Scale score. Data were analyzed from February 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023.
People experiencing homelessness were identified using the TQP's alternate home residence variable.
Morbidity, hemorrhage control surgery, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were assessed. Associations between homelessness and LOS (in days) were tested with hierarchical multivariable negative bionomial regression. Moderation effects of age and ISS on the association between homelessness and LOS were evaluated with interaction terms.
Of 1 441 982 patients (mean [SD] age, 55.1 [21.1] years; (822 491 [57.0%] men, 619 337 [43.0%] women, and 154 [0.01%] missing), 9065 (0.6%) were people experiencing homelessness. Unmatched people experiencing homelessness demonstrated higher rates of morbidity (221 [2.4%] vs 25 134 [1.8%]; P < .001), hemorrhage control surgery (289 [3.2%] vs 20 331 [1.4%]; P < .001), and ICU admission (2353 [26.0%] vs 307 714 [21.5%]; P < .001) compared with housed patients. The matched cohort comprised 8665 pairs at 378 hospitals. Differences in rates of morbidity, hemorrhage control surgery, and ICU admission between people experiencing homelessness and matched housed patients were not statistically significant. The median unadjusted LOS was 5 (IQR, 3-10) days among people experiencing homelessness and 4 (IQR, 2-8) days among matched housed patients (P < .001). People experiencing homelessness experienced a 22.1% longer adjusted LOS (incident rate ratio [IRR], 1.22 [95% CI, 1.19-1.25]). The greatest increase in adjusted LOS was observed among people experiencing homelessness who were 65 years or older (IRR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.32-1.54]). People experiencing homelessness with minor injury (ISS, 1-8) had the greatest relative increase in adjusted LOS (IRR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.25-1.35]) compared with people experiencing homelessness with severe injury (ISS ≥16; IRR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.09-1.20]).
The findings of this cohort study suggest that challenges in providing safe discharge to people experiencing homelessness after injury may lead to prolonged LOS. These findings underscore the need to reduce disparities in trauma outcomes and improve hospital resource use among people experiencing homelessness.
创伤是无家可归者住院的主要原因。然而,这一人群的住院过程尚不清楚。
评估无家可归是否与创伤后住院期间发病率和住院时间( LOS )增加有关,以及无家可归与 LOS 之间的关联是否受年龄和/或损伤严重程度评分( ISS )的调节。
设计、地点和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了美国外科医师学会创伤质量计划( TQP )的患者,年龄在 18 岁或以上,于 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间从北美 787 家医院出院存活。通过 TQP 的替代家庭居住变量识别无家可归者。对患者进行倾向性匹配,以匹配医院、性别、保险类型、合并症、损伤机制类型、损伤身体部位和格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分。数据分析于 2022 年 2 月 1 日至 2023 年 5 月 31 日进行。
无家可归者是通过 TQP 的替代家庭居住变量来识别的。
评估发病率、出血控制手术和重症监护病房( ICU )入院情况。使用分层多变量负二项式回归检验无家可归与 LOS (以天为单位)之间的关联。使用交互项评估年龄和 ISS 对无家可归与 LOS 之间关联的调节作用。
在 1441982 名患者(平均[标准差]年龄为 55.1[21.1]岁;822491 名[57.0%]男性,619337 名[43.0%]女性,154 名[0.01%]缺失)中,有 9065 名(0.6%)是无家可归者。未匹配的无家可归者发病率(221 名[2.4%] vs 25134 名[1.8%];P <.001)、出血控制手术(289 名[3.2%] vs 20331 名[1.4%];P <.001)和 ICU 入院(2353 名[26.0%] vs 307714 名[21.5%])的发生率高于有房患者。匹配队列包括 378 家医院的 8665 对。无家可归者与匹配有房患者在发病率、出血控制手术和 ICU 入院方面的差异无统计学意义。无家可归者的中位未调整 LOS 为 5(IQR,3-10)天,匹配有房患者为 4(IQR,2-8)天(P <.001)。无家可归者的调整 LOS 延长了 22.1%(发病率比[IRR],1.22[95% CI ,1.19-1.25])。在 65 岁或以上的无家可归者中,观察到调整后的 LOS 增加幅度最大(IRR,1.42[95% CI ,1.32-1.54])。ISS 为 1-8(轻度损伤)的无家可归者与 ISS 为≥16(严重损伤)的无家可归者相比,调整后的 LOS 相对增加幅度最大(IRR,1.30[95% CI ,1.25-1.35])。
这项队列研究的结果表明,在创伤后为无家可归者提供安全出院可能会导致 LOS 延长。这些发现强调了减少创伤结局差异和改善无家可归者医院资源利用的必要性。