Uguen Arnaud, Talagas Matthieu, Costa Sebastian, Samaison Laura, Paule Laure, Alavi Zarrin, De Braekeleer Marc, Le Marechal Cédric, Marcorelles Pascale
Inserm, U1078, Brest, F-29200, France.
CHRU Brest, Service d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, Brest, F-29220, France.
Diagn Pathol. 2015 Jul 25;10:121. doi: 10.1186/s13000-015-0359-0.
The determination of NRAS and BRAF mutation status is a major requirement in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. Mutation specific antibodies against NRAS(Q61R) and BRAF(V600E) proteins could offer additional data on tumor heterogeneity. The specificity and sensitivity of NRAS(Q61R) immunohistochemistry have recently been reported excellent. We aimed to determine the utility of immunohistochemistry using SP174 anti-NRAS(Q61R) and VE1 anti-BRAF(V600E) antibodies in the theranostic mutation screening of melanomas.
142 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded melanoma samples from 79 patients were analyzed using pyrosequencing and immunohistochemistry.
23 and 26 patients were concluded to have a NRAS-mutated or a BRAF-mutated melanoma respectively. The 23 NRAS (Q61R) and 23 BRAF (V600E) -mutant samples with pyrosequencing were all positive in immunohistochemistry with SP174 antibody and VE1 antibody respectively, without any false negative. Proportions and intensities of staining were varied. Other NRAS (Q61L) , NRAS (Q61K) , BRAF (V600K) and BRAF (V600R) mutants were negative in immunohistochemistry. 6 single cases were immunostained but identified as wild-type using pyrosequencing (1 with SP174 and 5 with VE1). 4/38 patients with multiple samples presented molecular discordant data. Technical limitations are discussed to explain those discrepancies. Anyway we could not rule out real tumor heterogeneity.
In our study, we showed that combining immunohistochemistry analysis targeting NRAS(Q61R) and BRAF(V600E) proteins with molecular analysis was a reliable theranostic tool to face challenging samples of melanoma.
确定NRAS和BRAF突变状态是转移性黑色素瘤患者治疗中的一项主要要求。针对NRAS(Q61R)和BRAF(V600E)蛋白的突变特异性抗体可为肿瘤异质性提供额外数据。最近报道NRAS(Q61R)免疫组化的特异性和敏感性极佳。我们旨在确定使用SP174抗NRAS(Q61R)和VE1抗BRAF(V600E)抗体进行免疫组化在黑色素瘤治疗诊断性突变筛查中的效用。
使用焦磷酸测序和免疫组化分析了来自79例患者的142份福尔马林固定石蜡包埋的黑色素瘤样本。
分别得出23例和26例患者患有NRAS突变或BRAF突变的黑色素瘤。经焦磷酸测序的23份NRAS(Q61R)和23份BRAF(V600E)突变样本在使用SP174抗体和VE1抗体的免疫组化中分别均为阳性,无任何假阴性。染色比例和强度各不相同。其他NRAS(Q61L)、NRAS(Q61K)、BRAF(V600K)和BRAF(V600R)突变体在免疫组化中为阴性。6例单病例经免疫染色,但焦磷酸测序鉴定为野生型(1例使用SP174,5例使用VE1)。38例有多个样本的患者中有4例呈现分子不一致数据。讨论了技术局限性以解释这些差异。无论如何,我们不能排除真正的肿瘤异质性。
在我们的研究中,我们表明将针对NRAS(Q61R)和BRAF(V600E)蛋白的免疫组化分析与分子分析相结合是面对具有挑战性的黑色素瘤样本的可靠治疗诊断工具。