Vigna Annalisa, Barba Marta, Frigerio Matteo
Department of Gynecology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, 16126 Genova, Italy.
Department of Gynecology, IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 13;12(16):1611. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161611.
Vaginal vault prolapse is one of the main reasons for reoperation in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Effective correction of the vaginal apex is essential for lasting repair for these women. Apical suspension of the sacrospinous ligament is probably one of the main vaginal treatments still offered to patients today. We proposed an evaluation of the functional and anatomical results of long-term sacrospinous ligament fixation.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 10-year results of sacrospinous ligament suspension as primary repair for apical prolapse and to evaluate long-term side effects.
A retrospective study analyzed 10-year follow-up after prolapse repair using sacrospinous ligament suspension. A subjective recurrence was identified as the postoperative occurrence of swelling symptoms based on a particular item on the Italian Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QoL) questionnaire. An objective recurrence was defined as a postoperative decline to stage II or below in any compartment based on the POP-Q system or the requirement for additional surgery. The assessment of postoperative subjective satisfaction was conducted using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score.
In total, 40 patients underwent sacrospinous ligament fixation. Objective recurrence was remarkably high, as it was observed in 17 (56.7%) patients. Subjective recurrence was reported by ten (33.3%) women, and reintervention occurred in two (6.7%) of patients. From the point of view of quality of life, according to the PGI-I, twenty-three (76.7%) patients described some degree of improvement after surgery, four (13.3%) described their status as unmodified, and three (10%) reported some form of worsening after primary treatment.
Transvaginal repair with sacrospinous fixation is a long-lasting option for prolapse repair, with improvement in every POP-q parameter. Some degree of anterior recurrence, recurrence of symptoms with swelling, or an overall worsening of quality of life after surgery is possible.
阴道穹隆脱垂是盆腔器官脱垂患者再次手术的主要原因之一。有效矫正阴道顶端对于这些女性的持久修复至关重要。骶棘韧带顶端悬吊术可能是目前仍为患者提供的主要阴道治疗方法之一。我们提议对长期骶棘韧带固定术的功能和解剖学结果进行评估。
本研究的目的是评估骶棘韧带悬吊术作为顶端脱垂初次修复的10年结果,并评估长期副作用。
一项回顾性研究分析了使用骶棘韧带悬吊术进行脱垂修复后的10年随访情况。主观复发被定义为术后根据意大利脱垂生活质量(P-QoL)问卷中的特定项目出现肿胀症状。客观复发被定义为术后根据盆腔器官脱垂定量分期系统(POP-Q)任何一个区域降至II期或以下,或需要再次手术。使用患者总体改善印象(PGI-I)评分对术后主观满意度进行评估。
共有40例患者接受了骶棘韧带固定术。客观复发率非常高,17例(56.7%)患者出现客观复发。10例(33.3%)女性报告有主观复发,2例(6.7%)患者需要再次干预。从生活质量的角度来看,根据PGI-I,23例(76.7%)患者描述术后有一定程度的改善,4例(13.3%)表示状态未改变,3例(10%)报告初次治疗后有某种形式的恶化。
经阴道骶棘韧带固定术是脱垂修复的一种持久选择,每个POP-q参数都有所改善。术后可能会出现一定程度的前部复发、伴有肿胀的症状复发或生活质量总体恶化。