Sævarsson Elvar Smári, Magnússon Kristján Thór, Sveinsson Thórarinn, Jóhannsson Erlingur, Arngrímsson Sigurbjörn Árni
a Center for Sport and Health Sciences, University of Iceland , Laugarvatn , Iceland and.
b Research Centre of Movement Science, University of Iceland , Reykjavík , Iceland.
Ann Hum Biol. 2016 May;43(3):229-34. doi: 10.3109/03014460.2015.1042522. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
The strong relation between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and adiposity renders their independent associations to metabolic risk factors difficult to ascertain.
To determine the associations of CRF and CRF relative to fat-free mass (CRFFFM) to total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, glucose, insulin and homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) and distinguish these relations from the association to adiposity.
Anthropometrics, body fat percentage (%Fat) and fat-free mass (from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) were measured in 127 (66 females) 17 and 23 year-olds. CRF from a maximal workload on a graded bicycle test and fasting blood samples were obtained.
CRF was significantly related to total cholesterol, triglycerides, insulin and HOMA (r = -0.24 to -0.49, p < 0.03), as were all adiposity measures (r = 0.21-0.53, p < 0.05). Correcting CRF for %Fat rendered the relation to metabolic risk factors non-significant (p = 0.09-0.21); however, CRFFFM was significantly related to the metabolic risk factors (r = -0.25 to -0.32, p < 0.02).
CRFFFM, where adiposity has been removed, is associated with metabolic risk factors, whereas CRF, which is related to adiposity, is not after adjustment for fatness. Previously, independent effects of CRF on health may have been underestimated by using an expression of CRF strongly related to the adiposity measures.
心肺适能(CRF)与肥胖之间的紧密关系使得难以确定它们与代谢风险因素的独立关联。
确定CRF以及相对于去脂体重的CRF(CRFFFM)与总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白、低密度脂蛋白、甘油三酯、葡萄糖、胰岛素和稳态模型评估(HOMA)之间的关联,并将这些关系与肥胖的关联区分开来。
对127名(66名女性)17至23岁的受试者进行人体测量、体脂百分比(%Fat)和去脂体重(通过双能X线吸收法测量)。通过分级自行车测试的最大工作量获得CRF,并采集空腹血样。
CRF与总胆固醇、甘油三酯、胰岛素和HOMA显著相关(r = -0.24至-0.49,p < 0.03),所有肥胖指标也如此(r = 0.21 - 0.53,p < 0.05)。对CRF进行%Fat校正后,其与代谢风险因素的关系不再显著(p = 0.09 - 0.21);然而,CRFFFM与代谢风险因素显著相关(r = -0.25至-0.32,p < 0.02)。
去除肥胖因素后的CRFFFM与代谢风险因素相关,而与肥胖相关的CRF在调整肥胖因素后则不然。此前,使用与肥胖指标密切相关的CRF表达方式可能低估了CRF对健康的独立影响。