Furlan Andrea D, Malmivaara Antti, Chou Roger, Maher Chris G, Deyo Rick A, Schoene Mark, Bronfort Gert, van Tulder Maurits W
*Cochrane Back and Neck Group, Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada †Centre for Health and Social Economics, Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland and Oulu University, Oulu, Finland ‡Departments of Medicine and Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) School of Medicine, Portland, OR §The George Institute for Global Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia ¶Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR ||Integrative Health, and Wellbeing Research Program, Center for Spirituality and Healing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN **Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Nov;40(21):1660-73. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001061.
Method guideline for systematic reviews of trials of interventions for neck and back pain, and related spinal disorders.
To help authors design, conduct, and report systematic reviews of trials in this field.
In 1997, the Cochrane Back Review Group editorial board published the Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews, which was updated in 2003 and in 2009. Since then, new methodological evidence has emerged and standards have changed, therefore it was clear that revisions were needed to the 2009 guideline. In May 2015 the group changed its name to Cochrane Back and Neck.
The editorial board met in September 2014 to review the relevant new methodological evidence and determine how it should be incorporated. Members of the advisory board were consulted. Based on the feedback received, an updated method guideline was prepared and approved by the editorial board.
We have updated recommendations in 7 categories: objectives, literature search, selection criteria, risk of bias assessment, data extraction, data analysis, and reporting of results and conclusions. Each category is classified into minimum criteria (mandatory) and further guidance (optional). This update also includes some new guidance for preparation of summary of finding tables and for conducting nonintervention reviews.
Citations of previous versions of the method guideline in published scientific articles (1193 in total) suggest that others may find this guideline useful to plan, conduct, or evaluate systematic reviews in the field of back and neck pain, and spinal disorders.
N/A.
颈部和背部疼痛及相关脊柱疾病干预试验系统评价的方法指南。
帮助作者设计、开展并报告该领域试验的系统评价。
1997年,Cochrane背部评价小组编辑委员会发表了《系统评价方法指南》,该指南于2003年和2009年进行了更新。自那时起,新的方法学证据不断涌现,标准也有所变化,因此显然需要对2009年的指南进行修订。2015年5月,该小组更名为Cochrane背部和颈部小组。
编辑委员会于2014年9月召开会议,审查相关的新方法学证据,并确定应如何纳入这些证据。咨询了顾问委员会成员。根据收到的反馈意见,编写了一份更新后的方法指南,并经编辑委员会批准。
我们在7个类别中更新了建议:目的、文献检索、选择标准、偏倚风险评估、数据提取、数据分析以及结果和结论的报告。每个类别分为最低标准(强制性)和进一步指导(可选)。本次更新还包括一些关于编制结果总结表和进行非干预性评价的新指导。
已发表科学文章中对该方法指南以前版本的引用(总共1193次)表明,其他人可能会发现该指南对于计划、开展或评估背部和颈部疼痛及脊柱疾病领域的系统评价很有用。
不适用。