Department of Medicine IV, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
STENO Diabetes Centre, Gentofte, Denmark.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015 Aug;30 Suppl 4:iv1-5. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv120.
Renal disease is prevalent in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. Aggressive metabolic control and lowering of systemic and/or intraglomerular blood pressure are effective interventions but not without side effects. Thus a better, early identification of patients at risk for incidence or progression to end-stage renal failure by the use of new, validated biomarkers is highly desirable. In the majority of patients, hypertension and hyperglycaemia are pathogenetically important pathways for the progression of renal disease. Nonetheless even aggressive therapy targeting these factors does not eliminate the risk of end-stage renal failure and experimental evidence suggests that many other pathways (e.g. tubulointerstitial hypoxia or inflammation etc.) also contribute. As their individual importance might vary from patient to patient, interventions which interfere are likely not to be therapeutically effective in all subjects. In this situation, an option to preserve the statistical power of clinical trials is to rely on biomarkers that reflect individual pathophysiology. In current clinical practice, albuminuria is the biomarker that has been best evaluated to guide stratified/personalized therapy but there is a clear need to expand our diagnostic abilities.
肾脏疾病在 2 型糖尿病患者中很常见。积极的代谢控制和降低全身和/或肾小球内血压是有效的干预措施,但并非没有副作用。因此,通过使用新的、经过验证的生物标志物,更好地、更早地识别出有发生或进展为终末期肾衰竭风险的患者,是非常可取的。在大多数患者中,高血压和高血糖是肾脏疾病进展的重要病理途径。尽管如此,即使针对这些因素进行积极的治疗,也不能消除终末期肾衰竭的风险,实验证据表明,许多其他途径(如肾小管间质缺氧或炎症等)也有贡献。由于它们对每个患者的重要性可能不同,因此干扰这些途径的干预措施可能在所有患者中都没有治疗效果。在这种情况下,一种保留临床试验统计效力的选择是依赖于反映个体病理生理学的生物标志物。在当前的临床实践中,蛋白尿是评估指导分层/个体化治疗的最佳生物标志物,但显然需要扩大我们的诊断能力。