• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康联盟建设:一项针对公寓居住难民的社区花园试点项目

Coalition Building for Health: A Community Garden Pilot Project with Apartment Dwelling Refugees.

作者信息

Eggert Lynne K, Blood-Siegfried Jane, Champagne Mary, Al-Jumaily Maha, Biederman Donna J

机构信息

a Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Community Health Nurs. 2015 Jul-Sep;32(3):141-50. doi: 10.1080/07370016.2015.1057072.

DOI:10.1080/07370016.2015.1057072
PMID:26212466
Abstract

Refugees often experience compromised health from both pre- and post-migration stressors. Coalition theory has helped guide the development of targeted programs to address the health care needs of vulnerable populations. Using the Community Coalition Action Theory as a framework, a coalition was formed to implement a community garden with apartment-dwelling refugees. Outcomes included successful coalition formation, a community garden, reported satisfaction from all gardeners with increased vegetable intake, access to culturally meaningful foods, and evidence of increased community engagement. The opportunity for community health nurses to convene a coalition to affect positive health for refugees is demonstrated.

摘要

难民常常因迁移前和迁移后的压力源而健康受损。联盟理论有助于指导制定有针对性的项目,以满足弱势群体的医疗保健需求。以社区联盟行动理论为框架,成立了一个联盟,为难民公寓居民实施社区花园项目。成果包括联盟的成功组建、一个社区花园、所有园丁报告对蔬菜摄入量增加、获得具有文化意义的食物感到满意,以及社区参与度提高的证据。这表明社区健康护士有机会召集联盟为难民带来积极的健康影响。

相似文献

1
Coalition Building for Health: A Community Garden Pilot Project with Apartment Dwelling Refugees.健康联盟建设:一项针对公寓居住难民的社区花园试点项目
J Community Health Nurs. 2015 Jul-Sep;32(3):141-50. doi: 10.1080/07370016.2015.1057072.
2
A garden pilot project enhances fruit and vegetable consumption among children.一个花园试点项目增加了儿童对水果和蔬菜的摄入量。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Jul;109(7):1220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.04.009.
3
The coalition technical assistance and training framework: helping community coalitions help themselves.联盟技术援助与培训框架:助力社区联盟自助。
Health Promot Pract. 2004 Apr;5(2):118-26. doi: 10.1177/1524839903257262.
4
Assessing Rural Health Coalitions Using the Public Health Logic Model: A Systematic Review.运用公共卫生逻辑模型评估农村卫生联盟:系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jun;58(6):864-878. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.01.015.
5
Community Gardens for Refugee and Immigrant Communities as a Means of Health Promotion.社区花园助力难民和移民社区健康促进
J Community Health. 2016 Dec;41(6):1153-1159. doi: 10.1007/s10900-016-0195-5.
6
Management and governance processes in community health coalitions: a procedural justice perspective.社区健康联盟中的管理与治理流程:程序正义视角
Health Educ Behav. 2002 Dec;29(6):737-54. doi: 10.1177/109019802237941.
7
A conceptual model for understanding effective coalitions involved in health promotion programming.一个用于理解参与健康促进规划的有效联盟的概念模型。
Public Health Nurs. 2006 Jan-Feb;23(1):67-73. doi: 10.1111/j.0737-1209.2006.230110.x.
8
Coalition for a Healthier Community: Lessons learned and implications for future work.更健康社区联盟:经验教训及对未来工作的启示
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Aug;51:85-8. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
9
Exploring community gardens in a health disparate population: findings from a mixed methods pilot study.在健康状况存在差异的人群中探索社区花园:一项混合方法试点研究的结果
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Summer;6(2):153-65. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0014.
10
Gardening for Health: Using Garden Coordinators and Volunteers to Implement Rural School and Community Gardens.园艺与健康:利用园艺协调员和志愿者实施农村学校和社区花园。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Nov 27;16:E156. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.190117.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining local smoke-free coalitions in Armenia and Georgia: context and outcomes of a matched-pairs community-randomised controlled trial.考察亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚的地方无烟煤联盟:一项配对社区随机对照试验的背景和结果。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Feb 7;9(2):e013282. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013282.
2
Community coalitions for smoke-free environments in Armenia and Georgia: A mixed methods analysis of coalition formation, implementation and perceived effectiveness.亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚的无烟环境社区联盟:对联盟形成、实施和感知有效性的混合方法分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 3;18(8):e0289149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289149. eCollection 2023.
3
Hands-on-ground in a new country: a community-based participatory evaluation with immigrant communities in Southern Alberta.
在新国家的实地考察:与艾伯塔省南部的移民社区开展的基于社区的参与式评估。
Glob Health Promot. 2023 Dec;30(4):25-34. doi: 10.1177/17579759231176293. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
4
Food Security Interventions among Refugees around the Globe: A Scoping Review.全球难民的粮食安全干预措施:范围综述。
Nutrients. 2022 Jan 25;14(3):522. doi: 10.3390/nu14030522.
5
The Relationship Between Nature and Immigrants' Integration, Wellbeing and Physical Activity: A Scoping Review.自然与移民融入、福祉及身体活动之间的关系:一项范围综述
J Immigr Minor Health. 2023 Feb;25(1):190-218. doi: 10.1007/s10903-022-01339-3. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
6
Community Gardening as a Way to Build Cross-Cultural Community Resilience in Intersectionally Diverse Gardeners: Community-Based Participatory Research and Campus-Community-Partnered Proposal.社区园艺:一种增强多元交叉园艺者跨文化社区复原力的方式:基于社区的参与式研究与校园-社区合作提案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Oct 7;9(10):e21218. doi: 10.2196/21218.
7
Community-Based Healthcare for Migrants and Refugees: A Scoping Literature Review of Best Practices.针对移民和难民的社区医疗保健:最佳实践的范围界定文献综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Apr 28;8(2):115. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020115.
8
A Scoping Review and Conceptual Model of Social Participation and Mental Health among Refugees and Asylum Seekers.难民和寻求庇护者的社会参与和心理健康的范围综述和概念模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 21;16(20):4027. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16204027.
9
Gardening for Health: Patterns of Gardening and Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Among the Navajo.园艺与健康:纳瓦霍人的园艺模式与果蔬摄入
J Community Health. 2018 Dec;43(6):1053-1060. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0521-1.