Suppr超能文献

病毒-宿主相互作用中的巨噬细胞极化

Macrophage Polarization in Virus-Host Interactions.

作者信息

Sang Yongming, Miller Laura C, Blecha Frank

机构信息

Department of Anatomy and Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.

Virus and Prion Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, USDA-ARS, 1920 Dayton Ave, Ames, IA 50010, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Cell Immunol. 2015 Apr;6(2). doi: 10.4172/2155-9899.1000311.

Abstract

Macrophage involvement in viral infections and antiviral states is common. However, this involvement has not been well-studied in the paradigm of macrophage polarization, which typically has been categorized by the dichotomy of classical (M1) and alternative (M2) statuses. Recent studies have revealed the complexity of macrophage polarization in response to various cellular mediators and exogenous stimuli by adopting a multipolar view to revisit the differential process of macrophages, especially those re-polarized during viral infections. Here, through examination of viral infections targeting macrophages/monocytic cells, we focus on the direct involvement of macrophage polarization during viral infections. Type I and type III interferons (IFNs) are critical in regulation of viral pathogenesis and host antiviral infection; thus, we propose to incorporate IFN-mediated antiviral states into the framework of macrophage polarization. This view is supported by the multifunctional properties of type I IFNs, which potentially elicit and regulate both M1- and M2-polarization in addition to inducing the antiviral state, and by the discoveries of viral mechanisms to adapt and modulate macrophage polarization. Indeed, several recent studies have demonstrated effective prevention of viral diseases through manipulation of macrophage immune statuses.

摘要

巨噬细胞参与病毒感染和抗病毒状态是常见的。然而,在巨噬细胞极化的范式中,这种参与尚未得到充分研究,巨噬细胞极化通常被分为经典(M1)和替代(M2)状态的二分法。最近的研究通过采用多极观点重新审视巨噬细胞的分化过程,揭示了巨噬细胞对各种细胞介质和外源性刺激作出反应时极化的复杂性,尤其是那些在病毒感染期间重新极化的巨噬细胞。在这里,通过研究针对巨噬细胞/单核细胞的病毒感染,我们关注病毒感染期间巨噬细胞极化的直接参与。I型和III型干扰素(IFN)在调节病毒发病机制和宿主抗病毒感染中起关键作用;因此,我们建议将IFN介导的抗病毒状态纳入巨噬细胞极化的框架。这一观点得到了I型IFN多功能特性的支持,I型IFN除了诱导抗病毒状态外,还可能引发和调节M1和M2极化,并且得到了病毒适应和调节巨噬细胞极化机制的发现的支持。事实上,最近的几项研究表明,通过操纵巨噬细胞免疫状态可以有效预防病毒性疾病。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bca/4512304/4b932085ce2a/nihms699110f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验