• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

既往早产的临床表现能否预测后续妊娠的风险?

Does the clinical presentation of a prior preterm birth predict risk in a subsequent pregnancy?

作者信息

Drassinower Daphnie, Običan Sarah G, Siddiq Zainab, Heller Danielle, Gyamfi-Bannerman Cynthia, Friedman Alexander M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;213(5):686.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.029. Epub 2015 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.029
PMID:26215326
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine whether risk of recurrent preterm birth differs based on the clinical presentation of a prior spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB): advanced cervical dilatation (ACD), preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), or preterm labor (PTL).

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included singleton pregnancies from 2009 to 2014 complicated by a history of prior SPTB. Women were categorized based on the clinical presentation of their prior preterm delivery as having ACD, PPROM, or PTL. Risks for sonographic short cervical length and recurrent SPTB were compared between women based on the clinical presentation of their prior preterm birth. Log-linear regression was used to control for confounders.

RESULTS

Of 522 patients included in this study, 96 (18.4%) had prior ACD, 246 (47.1%) had prior PPROM, and 180 (34.5%) had prior PTL. Recurrent PTB occurred in 55.2% of patients with a history of ACD compared with 27.2% of those with PPROM and 32.2% with PTL (P = .001). The mean gestational age at delivery was significantly lower for those with a history of ACD (34.0 weeks) compared with women with prior PPROM (37.2 weeks) or PTL (37.0 weeks) (P = .001). The lowest mean cervical length prior to 24 weeks was significantly shorter in patients with a history of advanced cervical dilation when compared with the other clinical presentations.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a history of ACD are at an increased risk of having recurrent preterm birth and cervical shortening in a subsequent pregnancy compared with women with prior preterm birth associated PPROM or PTL.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定复发性早产风险是否因既往自发性早产(SPTB)的临床表现而异:宫颈扩张提前(ACD)、胎膜早破(PPROM)或早产临产(PTL)。

研究设计

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2009年至2014年期间因既往有SPTB病史而并发的单胎妊娠。根据既往早产的临床表现,将女性分为ACD、PPROM或PTL组。根据既往早产的临床表现,比较女性之间超声检查发现宫颈短的风险和复发性SPTB的风险。采用对数线性回归来控制混杂因素。

结果

本研究纳入的522例患者中,96例(18.4%)既往有ACD,246例(47.1%)既往有PPROM,180例(34.5%)既往有PTL。有ACD病史的患者中复发性早产的发生率为55.2%,而有PPROM病史的患者为27.2%,有PTL病史的患者为32.2%(P = 0.001)。有ACD病史的患者分娩时的平均孕周(34.0周)显著低于既往有PPROM(37.2周)或PTL(37.0周)的女性(P = 0.001)。与其他临床表现相比,宫颈扩张提前病史的患者在24周前的最低平均宫颈长度明显更短。

结论

与既往有PPROM或PTL相关早产的女性相比,有ACD病史的患者在随后的妊娠中复发性早产和宫颈缩短的风险增加。

相似文献

1
Does the clinical presentation of a prior preterm birth predict risk in a subsequent pregnancy?既往早产的临床表现能否预测后续妊娠的风险?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;213(5):686.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.029. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
2
The Importance of Clinical Presentation in Risk and Management of Recurrent Preterm Birth.临床表现在复发性早产风险和管理中的重要性。
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Feb;38(3):205-211. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715116. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
3
Should phenotype of previous preterm birth influence management of women with short cervix in subsequent pregnancy? Comparison of vaginal progesterone and Arabin pessary.既往早产表型是否会影响后续妊娠宫颈短的妇女的管理?比较阴道孕酮和阿拉伯胶栓剂。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):529-534. doi: 10.1002/uog.19118.
4
Influence of gestational age and reason for prior preterm birth on rates of recurrent preterm delivery.孕周和既往早产原因对复发性早产发生率的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;205(3):275.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.043. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
5
Recurrent preterm birth in women treated with 17 α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate: the contribution of risk factors in the penultimate pregnancy.接受己酸17α-羟孕酮治疗的女性复发性早产:倒数第二次妊娠中危险因素的作用。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Jul;25(7):1034-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.614657. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
6
Use of transvaginal ultrasonography to predict preterm birth in women with a history of preterm birth.经阴道超声检查在有早产史女性中预测早产的应用。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct;32(5):640-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.6143.
7
Risk of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.复发性自发性早产的风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 5;7(6):e015402. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015402.
8
Prediction of preterm premature rupture of membranes by transvaginal ultrasound features and risk factors in a high-risk population.经阴道超声特征及高危人群危险因素对胎膜早破的预测
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep;20(3):245-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00759.x.
9
Short interpregnancy interval increases the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes and early delivery.妊娠间隔过短会增加胎膜早破和早产的风险。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Nov;31(22):3014-3020. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1362384. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
10
Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes in Singleton Nulliparous Spontaneous Preterm Birth with and without Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes-A National Population-Based Cohort Study.单胎初产妇自然早产伴或不伴胎膜早破的母儿结局——一项基于全国人群的队列研究
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e958-e967. doi: 10.1055/a-1973-7482. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Vaginal progesterone is as effective as cervical cerclage to prevent preterm birth in women with a singleton gestation, previous spontaneous preterm birth, and a short cervix: updated indirect comparison meta-analysis.阴道孕酮与宫颈环扎术预防单胎妊娠、既往自发性早产和短宫颈孕妇早产的效果相当:更新的间接比较荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;219(1):10-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.03.028. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
2
Risk of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.复发性自发性早产的风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 5;7(6):e015402. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015402.