• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓运动传导的电生理评估

Electrophysiologic evaluation of spinal cord motor conduction.

作者信息

Berger A R, Shahani B T

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Montefiore Hospital and Medical Center, Bronx, New York.

出版信息

Muscle Nerve. 1989 Dec;12(12):976-80. doi: 10.1002/mus.880121205.

DOI:10.1002/mus.880121205
PMID:2622471
Abstract

Spinal cord motor conduction was determined by stimulating with a monopolar needle at the C5 cord level and recording evoked motor potentials from the ipsilateral tibialis anterior muscle. Minimal F wave and direct motor latencies from the peroneal nerve were used to calculate peripheral conduction time. Mean velocity index (defined as the distance from C5 to L4 divided by central conduction time) of 15 normal subjects was 64.9 m/sec (SD 7.5). In 5 patients with multiple sclerosis the mean velocity index was 40.6 m/sec (SD 6.5), whereas in 3 patients with cervical myelopathies, due to extradural compression, the mean velocity index was 32.8 m/sec. A repeat study in one of the latter patients, 4 days after removal of a C5 disc, documented a marked improvement in cord conduction. In a patient with a thoracic and cervical syrinx, cervical cord stimulation on the clinically affected side failed to evoke a motor potential, whereas the unaffected side was normal. This method provides a simple and effective way to evaluate spinal cord motor conduction using routine electrodiagnostic equipment.

摘要

脊髓运动传导通过在C5脊髓水平用单极针刺激并记录同侧胫前肌的诱发运动电位来测定。使用腓总神经的最小F波和直接运动潜伏期来计算周围传导时间。15名正常受试者的平均速度指数(定义为从C5到L4的距离除以中枢传导时间)为64.9米/秒(标准差7.5)。5例多发性硬化症患者的平均速度指数为40.6米/秒(标准差6.5),而3例因硬膜外压迫导致颈椎病的患者,平均速度指数为32.8米/秒。其中一名后者患者在切除C5椎间盘4天后进行的重复研究记录了脊髓传导的显著改善。在一名患有胸段和颈段空洞症的患者中,对临床受累侧的颈髓刺激未能诱发运动电位,而未受累侧正常。该方法提供了一种使用常规电诊断设备评估脊髓运动传导的简单有效方法。

相似文献

1
Electrophysiologic evaluation of spinal cord motor conduction.脊髓运动传导的电生理评估
Muscle Nerve. 1989 Dec;12(12):976-80. doi: 10.1002/mus.880121205.
2
Estimation of normal motor conduction velocity of spinal cord by using transcranial electric stimulation and F-wave study.经颅电刺激结合F波研究评估脊髓正常运动传导速度
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Jan-Feb;31(1):47-52.
3
[A study of F-wave and cervical evoked action potentials by cutaneous recording (author's transl)].一项通过皮肤记录对F波和颈髓诱发电位的研究(作者译)
Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi. 1980 Mar;54(3):251-66.
4
Muscle compound motor action potentials from esophago-vertebral electrical stimulation of the spinal cord in the normal awake man.正常清醒男性脊髓食管-椎体电刺激诱发的肌肉复合运动动作电位。
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Dec;39(8):493-501.
5
Site of motor pathway excitation during cervical spinal stimulation.颈髓刺激期间运动通路兴奋的部位。
Act Nerv Super (Praha). 1990 Dec;32(4):250-6.
6
Estimate of motor conduction in human spinal cord: slowed conduction in spinal cord injury.人类脊髓运动传导的评估:脊髓损伤时传导减慢
Muscle Nerve. 1991 Oct;14(10):990-6. doi: 10.1002/mus.880141010.
7
Central motor conduction times using transcranial stimulation and F wave latencies.使用经颅刺激和F波潜伏期测定中枢运动传导时间。
Muscle Nerve. 1988 Feb;11(2):174-80. doi: 10.1002/mus.880110214.
8
Assessment of motor conduction times using magnetic stimulation of brain, spinal cord and peripheral nerves.使用脑、脊髓和周围神经磁刺激评估运动传导时间。
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Jan-Feb;33(1):3-10.
9
Adaptation of motor function after spinal cord injury: novel insights into spinal shock.脊髓损伤后运动功能的适应性:脊髓休克的新见解。
Brain. 2011 Feb;134(Pt 2):495-505. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq289. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
10
[Nerve conduction velocity of repeater F-waves is identical to that of M-waves].重复F波的神经传导速度与M波相同。
No To Shinkei. 2001 Dec;53(12):1111-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Central motor conduction studies in hereditary spastic paraplegia.遗传性痉挛性截瘫的中枢运动传导研究
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991 Sep;54(9):775-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.54.9.775.