Ahmad Saif S, Qian Wendi, Ellis Sarah, Mason Elaine, Khattak Muhammad A, Gupta Avinash, Shaw Heather, Quinton Amy, Kovarikova Jarmila, Thillai Kiruthikah, Rao Ankit, Board Ruth, Nobes Jenny, Dalgleish Angus, Grumett Simon, Maraveyas Anthony, Danson Sarah, Talbot Toby, Harries Mark, Marples Maria, Plummer Ruth, Kumar Satish, Nathan Paul, Middleton Mark R, Larkin James, Lorigan Paul, Wheater Matthew, Ottensmeier Christian H, Corrie Pippa G
aDepartment of Oncology bCambridge Cancer Trials Centre, Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit - Cancer Theme, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge cSouthampton Experimental Cancer Medicine Center, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton dDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie, Manchester eDepartment of Medicine, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London fOxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford gDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood hDepartment of Medical Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff iNorthern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle upon Tyne jDirectorate of Haematology and Oncology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London kDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals lDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal Preston Hospital mClinical Oncology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital nDivision of Clinical Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, London oDepartment of Oncology, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull pSheffield Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Sheffield, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield qClinical Oncology Department, Royal Cornwall Hospitals rSt. James's Institute of Oncology, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Melanoma Res. 2015 Oct;25(5):432-42. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000185.
Before licensing, ipilimumab was first made available to previously treated advanced melanoma patients through an expanded access programme (EAP) across Europe. We interrogated data from UK EAP patients to inform future clinical practice. Clinicians registered in the UK EAP provided anonymized patient data using a prespecified variable fields datasheet. Data collected were baseline patient characteristics, treatment delivered, toxicity, response, progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Data were received for 193 previously treated metastatic melanoma patients, whose primary sites were cutaneous (82%), uveal (8%), mucosal (2%), acral (3%) or unknown (5%). At baseline, 88% of patients had a performance status (PS) of 0-1 and 20% had brain metastases. Of the patients, 53% received all four planned cycles of ipilimumab; the most common reason for stopping early was disease progression, including death from melanoma. Toxicity was recorded for 171 patients, 30% of whom experienced an adverse event of grade 3 or higher, the most common being diarrhoea (13%) and fatigue (9%). At a median follow-up of 23 months, the median progression-free survival and OS were 2.8 and 6.1 months, respectively; the 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 31 and 14.8%, respectively. The 2-year OS was significantly lower for patients with poorer PS (P<0.0001), low albumin concentrations (P<0.0001), the presence of brain metastases (P=0.007) and lactate dehydrogenase levels more than two times the upper limit of normal (P<0.0001) at baseline. These baseline characteristics are negative predictors of benefit from ipilimumab and should be taken into consideration before prescription.
在获得许可之前,伊匹木单抗首先通过欧洲的一项扩大准入计划(EAP)提供给先前接受过治疗的晚期黑色素瘤患者。我们对来自英国EAP患者的数据进行了分析,以为未来的临床实践提供参考。在英国EAP注册的临床医生使用预先指定的可变字段数据表提供了匿名患者数据。收集的数据包括患者基线特征、接受的治疗、毒性、反应、无进展生存期和总生存期(OS)。共收到193例先前接受过治疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者的数据,其原发部位为皮肤(82%)、葡萄膜(8%)、黏膜(2%)、肢端(3%)或不明(5%)。基线时,88%的患者体能状态(PS)为0-1,20%有脑转移。其中,53%的患者接受了全部四个计划疗程的伊匹木单抗治疗;提前停药的最常见原因是疾病进展,包括死于黑色素瘤。记录了171例患者的毒性反应,其中30%经历了3级或更高等级的不良事件,最常见的是腹泻(13%)和疲劳(9%)。中位随访23个月时,中位无进展生存期和总生存期分别为2.8个月和6.1个月;1年和2年总生存率分别为31%和14.8%。基线时PS较差(P<0.0001)、白蛋白浓度低(P<0.0001)、存在脑转移(P=0.007)以及乳酸脱氢酶水平超过正常上限两倍(P<0.0001)的患者2年总生存率显著较低。这些基线特征是伊匹木单抗获益的阴性预测指标,处方前应予以考虑。