Grigoruta Mariana, Kong Xiaohua, Qin Yong
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79902, USA.
Department of Health Sciences, Biomedical Sciences Institute, Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez, Ciudad Juárez 32310, Mexico.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 19;14(14):5137. doi: 10.3390/jcm14145137.
Uveal melanoma (UM), the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults, poses a unique clinical challenge due to its high propensity for liver metastasis and poor responsiveness to conventional therapies. Despite the expanding landscape of immunotherapy in oncology, progress in managing metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) remains limited, and no universally accepted standard of care has been established. In this review, we examine the current state and evolving strategies in immunotherapy for mUM, focusing on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), T cell receptor (TCR)-engineered therapies, and tumor-targeted vaccines. We also present a meta-analytical comparison of clinical outcomes between ICI monotherapy and combination regimens, alongside the recently FDA-approved T cell engager tebentafusp. Our analysis indicates that the triple combination of Ipilimumab, anti-PD-1 agents, and tebentafusp significantly enhances objective response rates, disease control rates, 1-year overall survival rates, and median overall survival (mOS) compared to ICI monotherapy alone. However, this enhanced efficacy is accompanied by increased toxicity due to broader immune activation. In contrast, tebentafusp offers superior tumor specificity and a more favorable safety profile in HLA-A*02:01-positive patients, positioning it as a preferred therapeutic option for this genetically defined subset of UM. Additionally, early-phase studies involving dendritic cell-based immunotherapies and peptide vaccines has shown encouraging signs of tumor-specific immune activation, along with improved tolerability. Collectively, this review underscores the urgent need for more precise and effective immunotherapeutic approaches tailored to the unique biology of mUM.
葡萄膜黑色素瘤(UM)是成人中最常见的原发性眼内恶性肿瘤,由于其极易发生肝转移且对传统疗法反应不佳,带来了独特的临床挑战。尽管肿瘤学领域免疫疗法的应用范围不断扩大,但转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤(mUM)的治疗进展仍然有限,尚未建立普遍接受的标准治疗方案。在本综述中,我们研究了mUM免疫疗法的现状和不断发展的策略,重点关注免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)、T细胞受体(TCR)工程疗法和肿瘤靶向疫苗。我们还对ICI单药治疗与联合治疗方案的临床结果进行了荟萃分析比较,以及最近获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的T细胞衔接器替贝福司。我们的分析表明,与单独使用ICI单药治疗相比,伊匹木单抗、抗PD-1药物和替贝福司的三联组合显著提高了客观缓解率、疾病控制率、1年总生存率和中位总生存期(mOS)。然而,由于更广泛的免疫激活,这种增强的疗效伴随着毒性增加。相比之下,替贝福司在HLA-A*02:01阳性患者中具有更高的肿瘤特异性和更良好的安全性,使其成为该基因定义的UM亚组的首选治疗选择。此外,涉及基于树突状细胞的免疫疗法和肽疫苗的早期研究已显示出肿瘤特异性免疫激活的令人鼓舞的迹象,以及更好的耐受性。总体而言,本综述强调迫切需要针对mUM独特生物学特性的更精确、有效的免疫治疗方法。