Aita Marcio Aurélio, Vieira Ferreira Carlos Henrique, Schneider Ibanez Daniel, Saraiva Marquez Rafael, Hideki Ikeuti Douglas, Toledo Mota Rodrigo, Credidio Marcos Vinicius, Noboru Fujiki Edison
Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil.
Rev Bras Ortop. 2014 Apr 18;49(3):218-26. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2014.04.003. eCollection 2014 May-Jun.
the purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative radiological and clinical outcomes with minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis using three implants: volar locking plate, intramedullary nail system and nonbridging external fixator for distal radius fractures.
forty-eight patients (A group, 16; B group 16; C group 16) underwent minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis of reductible and unstable displaced (Type IIB by Rayhack Classification) distal radius fractures. In B group intramedullary nail system was used, in A group the patients were treated with volar locking plate and in C group the patients were treated by nonbridging external fixator from January 2011 to December 2012. The mean follow-up period was 12 months. Radiologic parameters, range of motion, grip strength, and disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand score were evaluated at each examination (3rd and 6th week, and 12th months). The visual analog scale of wrist pain and complications were assessed at the final follow-up.
the groups did not differ significantly in radiological outcomes after 12 months, but the clinical results, VAS scale and dash score in group A (volar locking plate) and B (nail intramedullary) were statistically significantly better than that of C group (nonbridging external fixator). One patient underwent an osteosynthesis with nail intramedullary and another with external fixator (C group) developed persistent pain near the site of the superficial radial nerve because of the distal's screw and pins, respectively.
in clinical parameters, significant differences in outcomes were found between groups A and B after six weeks versus C group.
本研究旨在比较使用三种植入物(掌侧锁定钢板、髓内钉系统和非桥接外固定架)对桡骨远端骨折进行微创经皮接骨术后的影像学和临床结果。
48例患者(A组16例;B组16例;C组16例)接受了对可复位且不稳定移位(根据Rayhack分类为IIB型)的桡骨远端骨折的微创经皮接骨术。2011年1月至2012年12月期间,B组使用髓内钉系统,A组患者接受掌侧锁定钢板治疗,C组患者接受非桥接外固定架治疗。平均随访期为12个月。每次检查(第3周、第6周和第12个月)时评估影像学参数、活动范围、握力以及手臂、肩部和手部残疾评分。在最终随访时评估手腕疼痛的视觉模拟量表和并发症情况。
12个月后,各组在影像学结果方面无显著差异,但A组(掌侧锁定钢板)和B组(髓内钉)的临床结果、视觉模拟量表评分和上肢功能障碍评分在统计学上显著优于C组(非桥接外固定架)。1例接受髓内钉接骨术的患者和另1例接受外固定架治疗(C组)的患者分别因远端螺钉和钢针在桡浅神经部位附近出现持续疼痛。
在临床参数方面,六周后A组和B组与C组之间在结果上存在显著差异。