Ahmed W, Staley C, Sadowsky M J, Gyawali P, Sidhu J P S, Palmer A, Beale D J, Toze S
CSIRO Land and Water, Ecosciences Precinct, Dutton Park, Queensland, Australia Faculty of Science, Health, and Education, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia
Biotechnology Institute, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Oct;81(20):7067-77. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02032-15. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
In this study, host-associated molecular markers and bacterial 16S rRNA gene community analysis using high-throughput sequencing were used to identify the sources of fecal pollution in environmental waters in Brisbane, Australia. A total of 92 fecal and composite wastewater samples were collected from different host groups (cat, cattle, dog, horse, human, and kangaroo), and 18 water samples were collected from six sites (BR1 to BR6) along the Brisbane River in Queensland, Australia. Bacterial communities in the fecal, wastewater, and river water samples were sequenced. Water samples were also tested for the presence of bird-associated (GFD), cattle-associated (CowM3), horse-associated, and human-associated (HF183) molecular markers, to provide multiple lines of evidence regarding the possible presence of fecal pollution associated with specific hosts. Among the 18 water samples tested, 83%, 33%, 17%, and 17% were real-time PCR positive for the GFD, HF183, CowM3, and horse markers, respectively. Among the potential sources of fecal pollution in water samples from the river, DNA sequencing tended to show relatively small contributions from wastewater treatment plants (up to 13% of sequence reads). Contributions from other animal sources were rarely detected and were very small (<3% of sequence reads). Source contributions determined via sequence analysis versus detection of molecular markers showed variable agreement. A lack of relationships among fecal indicator bacteria, host-associated molecular markers, and 16S rRNA gene community analysis data was also observed. Nonetheless, we show that bacterial community and host-associated molecular marker analyses can be combined to identify potential sources of fecal pollution in an urban river. This study is a proof of concept, and based on the results, we recommend using bacterial community analysis (where possible) along with PCR detection or quantification of host-associated molecular markers to provide information on the sources of fecal pollution in waterways.
在本研究中,利用宿主相关分子标记和高通量测序技术对细菌16S rRNA基因群落进行分析,以确定澳大利亚布里斯班环境水体中粪便污染的来源。共从不同宿主群体(猫、牛、狗、马、人类和袋鼠)采集了92份粪便和综合废水样本,并从澳大利亚昆士兰州布里斯班河沿线的6个地点(BR1至BR6)采集了18份水样。对粪便、废水和河水样本中的细菌群落进行了测序。还对水样进行了鸟类相关(GFD)、牛相关(CowM3)、马相关和人类相关(HF183)分子标记的检测,以提供多条证据证明可能存在与特定宿主相关的粪便污染。在检测的18份水样中,分别有83%、33%、17%和17%的水样对GFD、HF183、CowM3和马标记物的实时PCR检测呈阳性。在河流中水样粪便污染的潜在来源中,DNA测序显示污水处理厂的贡献相对较小(最多占序列读数的13%)。很少检测到其他动物来源的贡献,且贡献非常小(<序列读数的3%)。通过序列分析与分子标记物检测确定的来源贡献显示出不同程度的一致性。还观察到粪便指示菌、宿主相关分子标记物和16S rRNA基因群落分析数据之间缺乏相关性。尽管如此,我们表明细菌群落和宿主相关分子标记物分析可以结合起来,以识别城市河流中粪便污染的潜在来源。本研究是一个概念验证,基于研究结果,我们建议在可能的情况下,结合细菌群落分析以及宿主相关分子标记物的PCR检测或定量分析,以提供有关水道中粪便污染来源的信息。