Chen Zhi, Wang Peizhong Peter, Shi Lian, Zhu Yun, Liu Lin, Gao Zhiwei, Woodrow Janine, Roebothan Barbara
Division of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada.
Nutr J. 2015 Aug 1;14:75. doi: 10.1186/s12937-015-0064-6.
While a dietary pattern is often believed to be stable in a population, there is limited research assessing its stability over time. The objective of this study is to explore and compare major dietary patterns derived for the Canadian subpopulation residing in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL), through two time-separated studies using an identical method.
In this study, we derived and compared the major dietary patterns derived from two independent studies in the NL adult population. The first study was based on the healthy controls from a large population-based case-control study (CCS) in 2005. The second was from a food-frequency questionnaire validation project (FFQVP) conducted in 2012. In both studies, participants were recruited in the same manner and dietary information was collected by an identical self-administered food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Exploratory common factor analysis was conducted to identify major dietary patterns. A comparison was conducted between the two study populations.
Four major dietary patterns were identified: Meat, Vegetables/fruits, Fish, and Grains explaining 22%, 20%, 12% and 9% variance respectively, with a total variance of 63%. Three major dietary patterns were derived for the controls of the CCS: Meat, Plant-based diet, and Fish explaining 24%, 20%, and 10% variance respectively, with a total variance of 54%. As the Plant-based diet pattern derived for the CCS was a combination of the Vegetables/fruits and Grains patterns derived for the FFQVP, no considerable difference in dietary patterns was found between the two studies.
A comparison between two time-separated studies suggests that dietary patterns of the NL adult population have remained reasonably stable over almost a decade.
虽然人们通常认为饮食模式在人群中是稳定的,但评估其随时间变化稳定性的研究有限。本研究的目的是通过两项使用相同方法、时间间隔分开的研究,探索和比较居住在纽芬兰和拉布拉多(NL)的加拿大亚人群的主要饮食模式。
在本研究中,我们推导并比较了NL成年人群中两项独立研究得出的主要饮食模式。第一项研究基于2005年一项大型人群病例对照研究(CCS)中的健康对照。第二项研究来自2012年进行的食物频率问卷验证项目(FFQVP)。在两项研究中,参与者的招募方式相同,饮食信息通过相同的自填式食物频率问卷(FFQ)收集。进行探索性共同因素分析以确定主要饮食模式。对两个研究人群进行了比较。
确定了四种主要饮食模式:肉类、蔬菜/水果、鱼类和谷物,分别解释了22%、20%、12%和9%的方差,总方差为63%。CCS的对照组得出了三种主要饮食模式:肉类、植物性饮食和鱼类,分别解释了24%、20%和10%的方差,总方差为54%。由于CCS得出的植物性饮食模式是FFQVP得出的蔬菜/水果和谷物模式的组合,两项研究之间在饮食模式上未发现显著差异。
两项时间间隔分开的研究之间的比较表明,NL成年人群的饮食模式在近十年中保持了相当的稳定性。