Suppr超能文献

技术说明:国际电工委员会心脏X射线图像探测器方法中边缘角度测定方法对探测量子效率的影响

Technical Note: Impact on detective quantum efficiency of edge angle determination method by International Electrotechnical Commission methodology for cardiac x-ray image detectors.

作者信息

Gislason-Lee Amber J, Tunstall Clare M, Kengyelics Stephen K, Cowen Arnold R, Davies Andrew G

机构信息

LXi Research, Division of Biomedical Imaging, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2015 Aug;42(8):4423-7. doi: 10.1118/1.4923178.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Cardiac x-ray detectors are used to acquire moving images in real-time for angiography and interventional procedures. Detective quantum efficiency (DQE) is not generally measured on these dynamic detectors; the required "for processing" image data and control of x-ray settings have not been accessible. By 2016, USA hospital physicists will have the ability to measure DQE and will likely utilize the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard for measuring DQE of dynamic x-ray imaging devices. The current IEC standard requires an image of a tilted tungsten edge test object to obtain modulation transfer function (MTF) for DQE calculation. It specifies the range of edge angles to use; however, it does not specify a preferred method to determine this angle for image analysis. The study aimed to answer the question "will my choice in method impact my results?" Four different established edge angle determination methods were compared to investigate the impact on DQE.

METHODS

Following the IEC standard, edge and flat field images were acquired on a cardiac flat-panel detector to calculate MTF and noise power spectrum, respectively, to determine DQE. Accuracy of the methods in determining the correct angle was ascertained using a simulated edge image with known angulations. Precision of the methods was ascertained using variability of MTF and DQE, calculated via bootstrapping.

RESULTS

Three methods provided near equal angles and the same MTF while the fourth, with an angular difference of 6%, had a MTF lower by 3% at 1.5 mm(-1) spatial frequency and 8% at 2.5 mm(-1); corresponding DQE differences were 6% at 1.5 mm(-1) and 17% at 2.5 mm(-1); differences were greater than standard deviations in the measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

DQE measurements may vary by a significant amount, depending on the method used to determine the edge angle when following the IEC standard methodology for a cardiac x-ray detector. The most accurate and precise methods are recommended for absolute assessments and reproducible measurements, respectively.

摘要

目的

心脏X射线探测器用于在血管造影和介入手术中实时获取动态图像。通常不会在这些动态探测器上测量探测量子效率(DQE);之前无法获取所需的“用于处理”的图像数据以及X射线设置的控制。到2016年,美国医院的物理学家将有能力测量DQE,并且可能会采用国际电工委员会(IEC)的标准来测量动态X射线成像设备的DQE。当前的IEC标准要求获取倾斜钨边缘测试物体的图像,以获得用于DQE计算的调制传递函数(MTF)。它规定了要使用的边缘角度范围;然而,它没有指定用于图像分析确定该角度的首选方法。该研究旨在回答“我的方法选择会影响我的结果吗?”这一问题。比较了四种不同的既定边缘角度确定方法,以研究其对DQE的影响。

方法

按照IEC标准,在心脏平板探测器上采集边缘和平坦场图像,分别计算MTF和噪声功率谱,以确定DQE。使用具有已知角度的模拟边缘图像确定方法在确定正确角度方面的准确性。通过自展法计算MTF和DQE的变异性来确定方法的精度。

结果

三种方法提供的角度几乎相等且MTF相同,而第四种方法的角度差异为6%,在1.5 mm⁻¹空间频率下MTF低3%,在2.5 mm⁻¹下低8%;相应的DQE差异在1.5 mm⁻¹时为6%,在2.5 mm⁻¹时为17%;差异大于测量中的标准偏差。

结论

按照心脏X射线探测器的IEC标准方法,根据用于确定边缘角度的方法不同,DQE测量结果可能会有很大差异。分别推荐使用最准确和最精确的方法进行绝对评估和可重复测量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验