Department of Radiology, UZ Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Medical Imaging Research Center, Medical Physics and Quality Assessment, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Nov 21;62(24):N573-N586. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9599.
Physical image quality of five x-ray detectors used in the paediatric imaging department is characterized with the aim of establishing the range/scope of imaging performance provided by these detectors for neonatal imaging. Two computed radiography (CR) detectors (MD4.0 powder imaging plate (PIP) and HD5.0 needle imaging plate (NIP), Agfa HealthCare NV, B-2640 Mortsel, Belgium) and three flat panel detectors (FPD) (the Agfa DX-D35C and DX-D45C and the DRX-2530C (Carestream Health Inc., Rochester, NY 14608, USA)) were assessed. Physical image quality was characterized using the detector metrics given by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC 62220-1) to measure modulation transfer function (MTF), the noise power spectrum (NPS) and the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) using the IEC-specified beam qualities of RQA3 and RQA5. The DQE was evaluated at the normal operating detector air kerma (DAK) level, defined at 2.5 µGy for all detectors, and at factors of 1/3.2 and 3.2 times the normal level. MTF curves for the different detectors were similar at both RQA3 and RQA5 energies; the average spatial frequency for the 50% point (MTF0.5) at RQA3 was 1.26 mm, with a range from 1.20 mm to 1.37 mm. The DQE of the NIP CR compared to the PIP CR was notably greater and similar to that for the FPD devices. At RQA3, average DQE for the FPD and NIP (at 0.5 mm; 2.5 µGy) was 0.57 compared to 0.26 for the PIP CR. At the RQA5 energy, the DRX-2530C and the DX-D45C had the highest DQE (~0.6 at 0.5 mm; 2.5 µGy). Noise separation analysis using the polynomial model showed higher electronic noise for the DX-D35C and DRX-2530C detectors; this explains the reduced DQE seen at 0.7 µGy/image. The NIP CR detector offers notably improved DQE performance compared to the PIP CR system and a value similar to the DQE for FPD devices at the RQA3 energy.
本研究旨在评估儿科影像部门中使用的五种 X 射线探测器的物理图像质量,确定这些探测器在新生儿成像方面的成像性能范围。评估了两种计算机射线照相(CR)探测器(MD4.0 粉末成像板(PIP)和 HD5.0 针状成像板(NIP),Agfa HealthCare NV,B-2640 Mortsel,比利时)和三种平板探测器(FPD)(Agfa DX-D35C 和 DX-D45C 以及 DRX-2530C(Carestream Health Inc.,罗切斯特,NY 14608,美国))。使用国际电工委员会(IEC)规定的 RQA3 和 RQA5 光束质量来测量调制传递函数(MTF)、噪声功率谱(NPS)和探测量子效率(DQE),根据 IEC 给出的探测器指标来评估物理图像质量。在所有探测器的 2.5 µGy 定义的正常工作探测器空气比释动能(DAK)水平以及 1/3.2 和 3.2 倍正常水平下评估 DQE。在 RQA3 和 RQA5 能量下,不同探测器的 MTF 曲线相似;在 RQA3 时,50%点(MTF0.5)的平均空间频率为 1.26mm,范围为 1.20mm 至 1.37mm。与 PIP CR 相比,NIP CR 的 DQE 明显更大,与 FPD 设备相似。在 RQA3 时,FPD 和 NIP(0.5mm;2.5µGy)的平均 DQE 为 0.57,而 PIP CR 为 0.26。在 RQA5 能量下,DRX-2530C 和 DX-D45C 的 DQE 最高(0.5mm;2.5µGy 时为 0.6)。使用多项式模型进行噪声分离分析表明,DX-D35C 和 DRX-2530C 探测器的电子噪声较高;这解释了在 0.7µGy/image 时观察到的 DQE 降低。与 PIP CR 系统相比,NIP CR 探测器的 DQE 性能明显提高,在 RQA3 能量下与 FPD 设备的 DQE 值相似。