Darchuk Emily M, Waite-Cusic Joy, Meunier-Goddik Lisbeth
Department of Food Science and Technology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331.
Department of Food Science and Technology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331.
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Oct;98(10):7384-93. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9746. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
Consolidation of the US milk industry has led to use of tankers for up to 24 h in between thorough cleanings. As the heavy use of tankers has not been previously studied, the effect of this form of hauling on raw milk quality is unknown. This study focused on the effect of frequent tanker use during hauling on raw milk quality at a commercial facility. Standard tanker use (cleaned-in-place once per 24 h) served as our control and incremental cleaning treatments (water rinse after each load, water rinse after each load with a sanitizer treatment after 12 h, and 12 h of sanitizer treatment) were added to the study to understand if any effect could be mitigated by more frequent cleaning. Producer samples were collected from the farm before loading milk into the tanker as well as sampling the same milk directly out of the tanker truck before unloading at the manufacturer. The study was repeated at 2 different dairy manufacturing facilities, once during the summer and once during the winter. Milk quality was quantified through industry-relevant microbiological tests: individual bacteria count, thermophilic spore count, and preliminary incubation count. Within the study we defined a negative effect on milk quality as a statistically significant difference between the tanker and producer samples in any of the 3 microbial tests conducted between treatments. Results from the study showed no clear effect due to hauling in individual bacteria count, thermophilic spore count, or preliminary incubation counts. There was also no difference in milk quality between the 2 plants, suggesting that neither season nor location affected our results in the standard use variable. As we did not see a negative effect on milk quality in the standard use variable, the addition of cleaning treatments did not appear to provide any clear benefit. Tanker surface swabs and ATP swabs were also used to monitor tanker sanitation and the efficacy of cleaning treatments. Both surface and ATP swabs revealed differences between cleaning efficacy at the 2 facilities. Although the differences in efficacy did not influence tanker milk quality within our study, variability in sanitation may provide a source of contamination that could negatively affect raw milk quality in other areas. Based on this study, current hauling practices appear to be effective in mitigating any measurable effect on raw milk quality; however, further investigation is needed before making industry-wide recommendations.
美国牛奶行业的整合导致运输罐车在两次彻底清洁之间的使用时长可达24小时。由于此前尚未对运输罐车的频繁使用进行研究,这种运输方式对原料奶质量的影响尚不清楚。本研究聚焦于在商业机构中运输过程中频繁使用运输罐车对原料奶质量的影响。标准的罐车使用方式(每24小时就地清洗一次)作为我们的对照,研究中还增加了递增式清洗处理(每次装载后用水冲洗、每次装载后用水冲洗并在12小时后进行消毒剂处理、以及12小时的消毒剂处理),以了解是否可以通过更频繁的清洗减轻任何影响。在将牛奶装入罐车之前从农场采集生产者样本,并在罐车在制造商处卸载之前直接从罐式卡车中对同一批牛奶进行采样。该研究在2个不同的乳制品制造设施重复进行,一次在夏季,一次在冬季。通过与行业相关的微生物测试对牛奶质量进行量化:个体细菌计数、嗜热芽孢计数和初步培养计数。在该研究中,我们将对牛奶质量的负面影响定义为在各处理之间进行的3项微生物测试中的任何一项中,罐车样本和生产者样本之间存在统计学上的显著差异。研究结果表明,在个体细菌计数、嗜热芽孢计数或初步培养计数方面,运输未产生明显影响。两家工厂之间的牛奶质量也没有差异,这表明季节和地点均未影响我们在标准使用变量方面的结果。由于我们在标准使用变量中未看到对牛奶质量的负面影响,因此增加清洗处理似乎并未带来任何明显益处。还使用了罐车表面拭子和ATP拭子来监测罐车的卫生状况以及清洗处理的效果。表面拭子和ATP拭子均显示出两家工厂在清洗效果上存在差异。尽管在我们的研究中,效果差异并未影响罐车牛奶质量,但卫生状况的变化可能会提供一个污染源头,从而可能对其他地区的原料奶质量产生负面影响。基于本研究,目前的运输做法似乎能够有效减轻对原料奶质量的任何可测量影响;然而,在提出全行业建议之前,还需要进一步调查。