Suppr超能文献

从农场到奶粉生产的牛奶微生物质量:一项工业案例研究。

Microbiological quality of milk from farms to milk powder manufacture: an industrial case study.

机构信息

Teagasc Moorepark,Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre,Fermoy,County Cork,Ireland.

School of Food and Nutritional Sciences,University College Cork,County Cork,Ireland.

出版信息

J Dairy Res. 2019 May;86(2):242-247. doi: 10.1017/S0022029919000347. Epub 2019 Jun 3.

Abstract

The experiments reported in this research paper aimed to track the microbiological load of milk throughout a low-heat skim milk powder (SMP) manufacturing process, from farm bulk tanks to final powder, during mid- and late-lactation (spring and winter, respectively). In the milk powder processing plant studied, low-heat SMP was produced using only the milk supplied by the farms involved in this study. Samples of milk were collected from farm bulk tanks (mid-lactation: 67 farms; late-lactation: 150 farms), collection tankers (CTs), whole milk silo (WMS), skim milk silo (SMS), cream silo (CS) and final SMP. During mid-lactation, the raw milk produced on-farm and transported by the CTs had better microbiological quality than the late-lactation raw milk (e.g., total bacterial count (TBC): 3.60 ± 0.55 and 4.37 ± 0.62 log 10 cfu/ml, respectively). After pasteurisation, reductions in TBC, psychrotrophic (PBC) and proteolytic (PROT) bacterial counts were of lower magnitude in late-lactation than in mid-lactation milk, while thermoduric (LPC-laboratory pasteurisation count) and thermophilic (THERM) bacterial counts were not reduced in both periods. The microbiological quality of the SMP produced was better when using mid-lactation than late-lactation milk (e.g., TBC: 2.36 ± 0.09 and 3.55 ± 0.13 cfu/g, respectively), as mid-lactation raw milk had better quality than late-lactation milk. The bacterial counts of some CTs and of the WMS samples were higher than the upper confidence limit predicted using the bacterial counts measured in the farm milk samples, indicating that the transport conditions or cleaning protocols could have influenced the microbiological load. Therefore, during the different production seasons, appropriate cow management and hygiene practices (on-farm and within the factory) are necessary to control the numbers of different bacterial groups in milk, as those can influence the effectiveness of thermal treatments and consequently affect final product quality.

摘要

本研究论文报道的实验旨在跟踪低热处理脱脂奶粉(SMP)生产过程中微生物负荷,从农场散装罐到最终粉末,分别在泌乳中期和后期(春季和冬季)。在所研究的奶粉加工厂中,仅使用参与该研究的农场提供的牛奶生产低热处理 SMP。从农场散装罐(泌乳中期:67 个农场;泌乳后期:150 个农场)、收集罐(CT)、全脂奶筒仓(WMS)、脱脂奶筒仓(SMS)、奶油筒仓(CS)和最终 SMP 收集牛奶样品。在泌乳中期,农场生产的原奶由 CT 运输,其微生物质量优于泌乳后期的原奶(例如,总细菌计数(TBC):分别为 3.60±0.55 和 4.37±0.62 log 10 cfu/ml)。巴氏杀菌后,与泌乳中期牛奶相比,泌乳后期牛奶中 TBC、嗜冷菌(PBC)和蛋白酶(PROT)细菌计数的减少幅度较小,而耐热菌(LPC-实验室巴氏杀菌计数)和嗜热菌(THERM)细菌计数在两个时期均未减少。使用泌乳中期牛奶比使用泌乳后期牛奶生产的 SMP 微生物质量更好(例如,TBC:分别为 2.36±0.09 和 3.55±0.13 cfu/g),因为泌乳中期原奶质量优于泌乳后期原奶。一些 CT 和 WMS 样品的细菌计数高于使用农场牛奶样品测量的细菌计数预测的上限置信限,这表明运输条件或清洁方案可能影响了微生物负荷。因此,在不同的生产季节,需要对奶牛进行适当的管理和卫生实践(农场内和工厂内),以控制牛奶中不同细菌群的数量,因为这些因素会影响热处理的效果,从而影响最终产品的质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验