Ogura Yukiko, Izumi Takeshi, Yoshioka Mitsuhiro, Matsushima Toshiya
Graduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University, N10-W8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan; JSPS fellow DC/PD (Japan Society for Promotion of Sciences), Ichiban-cho 8, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-8471, Japan.
Department of Neuropharmacology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, N15-W7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
Behav Brain Res. 2015 Nov 1;294:162-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.07.052. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
The frequency or intensity of behavior is often facilitated by the presence of others. This social facilitation has been reported in a variety of animals, including birds and humans. Based on Zajonc's "drive theory," we hypothesized that facilitation and drive have shared neural mechanisms, and that dopaminergic projections from the midbrain to striatum are involved. As the ascending dopaminergic projections include the mesolimbic and nigrostriatal pathways, we targeted our lesions at the medial striatum (MSt) and substantia nigra (SN). We found that a bilateral electrolytic lesion of the MSt suppressed baseline foraging effort, but social facilitation was intact. Conversely, an electrolytic lesion targeted at the unilateral SN (on the right side) partially suppressed social facilitation, while baseline foraging effort remained unaffected. However, selective depletion of catecholaminergic (thyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactive) terminals by micro-infusion of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) to bilateral MSt had no significant effects on foraging behavior, whereas it impaired formation of the association memory reinforced by water reward. Neurochemical assay by high-perfromance liquid chromatography also revealed a significant decrease in the dopamine and noradrenaline contents in MSt after 6-OHDA micro-infusion compared with intact control chicks. Thus, we conclude that the neural substrate of social facilitation can be dissociated from that responsible for reward-based foraging effort, and that ascending dopaminergic pathways do not appear to contribute to social facilitation. Based on our detailed analysis of the lesion areas, we discuss fiber tracts or neural components of the midbrain tegmental area that may be responsible for social facilitation.
行为的频率或强度常常会因他人的在场而得到促进。这种社会促进现象在包括鸟类和人类在内的多种动物中都有报道。基于扎荣茨的“驱力理论”,我们推测促进作用和驱力具有共同的神经机制,且中脑到纹状体的多巴胺能投射参与其中。由于上行多巴胺能投射包括中脑边缘通路和黑质纹状体通路,我们将损伤靶点定位于内侧纹状体(MSt)和黑质(SN)。我们发现,MSt的双侧电解损伤抑制了基线觅食努力,但社会促进作用完好无损。相反,针对单侧SN(右侧)的电解损伤部分抑制了社会促进作用,而基线觅食努力未受影响。然而,通过向双侧MSt微量注射6-羟基多巴胺(6-OHDA)选择性耗尽儿茶酚胺能(酪氨酸羟化酶免疫反应性)终末,对觅食行为没有显著影响,却损害了由水奖励强化的联想记忆的形成。与完整对照雏鸡相比,高效液相色谱法进行的神经化学分析还显示,6-OHDA微量注射后MSt中的多巴胺和去甲肾上腺素含量显著降低。因此,我们得出结论,社会促进作用的神经基质可与基于奖励的觅食努力的神经基质相分离,且上行多巴胺能通路似乎对社会促进作用没有贡献。基于我们对损伤区域的详细分析,我们讨论了中脑被盖区可能负责社会促进作用的纤维束或神经成分。