• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同进食者的在场会自动使人类的觅食策略转向“快速且容易获取”的食物。

Mere presence of co-eater automatically shifts foraging tactics toward 'Fast and Easy' food in humans.

作者信息

Ogura Yukiko, Masamoto Taku, Kameda Tatsuya

机构信息

Department of Social Psychology, The University of Tokyo, Japan.

Brain Science Institute, Tamagawa University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Apr 1;7(4):200044. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200044. eCollection 2020 Apr.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.200044
PMID:32431897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7211848/
Abstract

Competition for food resources is widespread in nature. The foraging behaviour of social animals should thus be adapted to potential food competition. We conjectured that in the presence of co-foragers, animals would shift their tactics to forage more frequently for smaller food. Because smaller foods are more abundant in nature and allow faster consumption, such tactics should allow animals to consume food more securely against scrounging. We experimentally tested whether such a shift would be triggered automatically in human eating behaviour, even when there was no rivalry about food consumption. To prevent subjects from having rivalry, they were instructed to engage in a 'taste test' in a laboratory, alone or in pairs. Even though the other subject was merely present and there was no real competition for food, subjects in pairs immediately exhibited a systematic behavioural shift to reaching for smaller food amounts more frequently, which was clearly distinct from their reaching patterns both when eating alone and when simply weighing the same food without eating any. These patterns suggest that behavioural shifts in the presence of others may be built-in tactics in humans (and possibly in other gregarious animals as well) to adapt to potential food competition in social foraging.

摘要

对食物资源的竞争在自然界中普遍存在。因此,群居动物的觅食行为应适应潜在的食物竞争。我们推测,在有共同觅食者的情况下,动物会改变策略,更频繁地去寻找较小的食物。因为较小的食物在自然界中更为丰富,且能更快地被消耗,这样的策略应能让动物在防止被抢夺的情况下更安全地获取食物。我们通过实验测试了在人类进食行为中,即使不存在食物消费方面的竞争,这种转变是否会自动触发。为了防止受试者产生竞争,他们被要求在实验室单独或成对进行“味觉测试”。尽管另一名受试者只是在场,且不存在对食物的实际竞争,但成对的受试者立即表现出一种系统性的行为转变,即更频繁地去拿取较少的食物量,这与他们单独进食时以及只是单纯称量相同食物而不吃时的拿取模式明显不同。这些模式表明,在他人在场时的行为转变可能是人类(可能其他群居动物也是如此)为适应社会觅食中潜在的食物竞争而内置的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5345/7211848/977d636ca069/rsos200044-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5345/7211848/800e491c36f3/rsos200044-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5345/7211848/023e3e468e16/rsos200044-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5345/7211848/977d636ca069/rsos200044-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5345/7211848/800e491c36f3/rsos200044-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5345/7211848/023e3e468e16/rsos200044-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5345/7211848/977d636ca069/rsos200044-g3.jpg

相似文献

1
Mere presence of co-eater automatically shifts foraging tactics toward 'Fast and Easy' food in humans.共同进食者的在场会自动使人类的觅食策略转向“快速且容易获取”的食物。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Apr 1;7(4):200044. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200044. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Cognition and covariance in the producer-scrounger game.生产者-觅食者博弈中的认知与协方差。
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Nov;90(11):2497-2509. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13551. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
3
Slow-exploring captive red knots were quicker to find food in a social setting than fast explorers.在社交环境中,行动缓慢、善于探索的圈养红腹滨鹬比行动迅速的探索者更快找到食物。
Biol Lett. 2024 Jul;20(7):20240139. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0139. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
4
Seasonal shifts in the provisioning behavior of chinstrap penguins, Pygoscelis antarctica.南极帽带企鹅(Pygoscelis antarctica)觅食行为的季节性变化。
Oecologia. 2002 Apr;131(2):306-318. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-0880-1. Epub 2002 Apr 1.
5
Producers and scroungers: feeding-type composition changes with group size in a socially foraging spider.生产者与窃取者:在一种社会性觅食蜘蛛中,取食类型的构成随群体大小而变化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Apr 13;283(1828). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0114.
6
Switching spatial scale reveals dominance-dependent social foraging tactics in a wild primate.改变空间尺度揭示了野生灵长类动物中依赖优势地位的社会觅食策略。
PeerJ. 2017 Jun 30;5:e3462. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3462. eCollection 2017.
7
To graze or gorge: consistency and flexibility of individual foraging tactics in tits.觅食或饱食:山雀个体觅食策略的一致性与灵活性
J Anim Ecol. 2017 Jul;86(4):826-836. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12651. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
8
On the importance of accounting for alternative foraging tactics when assessing cognitive performance in wild animals.在评估野生动物认知表现时,考虑替代觅食策略的重要性。
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Nov;90(11):2474-2477. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13602.
9
Social effects on foraging behavior and success depend on local environmental conditions.社会因素对觅食行为和成功的影响取决于当地的环境条件。
Ecol Evol. 2015 Jan;5(2):475-92. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1377. Epub 2015 Jan 4.
10
Skill trade-offs promote persistent individual differences and specialized tactics.技能权衡促进了个体差异的持续存在和专门策略的形成。
Ecol Evol. 2023 Oct 4;13(10):e10578. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10578. eCollection 2023 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Costs and benefits of group living in primates: an energetic perspective.灵长类动物群居的成本与收益:能量视角
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Aug 19;372(1727). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0239.
2
Selective contribution of the telencephalic arcopallium to the social facilitation of foraging efforts in the domestic chick.端脑弓状皮质对家鸡觅食行为社会促进作用的选择性贡献。
Eur J Neurosci. 2017 Feb;45(3):365-380. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13475. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
3
Distinct neural patterns of social cognition for cooperation versus competition.
合作与竞争中社会认知的不同神经模式。
Neuroimage. 2016 Aug 15;137:86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.069. Epub 2016 May 7.
4
Dissociation of the neural substrates of foraging effort and its social facilitation in the domestic chick.家鸡觅食努力及其社会促进作用的神经基质的分离
Behav Brain Res. 2015 Nov 1;294:162-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.07.052. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
5
The social facilitation of eating. A review.饮食的社会促进作用。一篇综述。
Appetite. 2015 Mar;86:61-73. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.09.016. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
6
Social foragers adopt a riskier foraging mode in the centre of their groups.社会觅食者在群体中心采用更冒险的觅食模式。
Biol Lett. 2013 Oct 9;9(6):20130528. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0528. Print 2013.
7
Imaging social motivation: distinct brain mechanisms drive effort production during collaboration versus competition.成像社会动机:合作与竞争中努力产生的不同大脑机制。
J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 2;33(40):15894-902. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0143-13.2013.
8
Social facilitation revisited: increase in foraging efforts and synchronization of running in domestic chicks.重新审视社会促进作用:家鸡觅食努力的增加和奔跑的同步性。
Front Neurosci. 2011 Jul 21;5:91. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00091. eCollection 2011.
9
Evolution of body size: consequences of an energetic definition of fitness.体型的进化:适应性能量定义的后果
Am Nat. 1993 Oct;142(4):573-84. doi: 10.1086/285558.
10
Lateralization of social cognition in the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus).家鸡(原鸡)社会认知的偏侧化
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Apr 12;364(1519):965-81. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0229.