Dubé Eve, Vivion Maryline, Sauvageau Chantal, Gagneur Arnaud, Gagnon Raymonde, Guay Maryse
Quebec National Institute of Public Health, Quebec G1E 7G9, Canada.
Laval University Hospital Research Center, Quebec G1V 4G5, Canada.
J Clin Med. 2013 Nov 4;2(4):242-59. doi: 10.3390/jcm2040242.
Even if vaccination is often described as one of the great achievements of public health, results of recent studies have shown that parental acceptance of vaccination is eroding. Health providers' knowledge and attitudes about vaccines are important determinants of their own vaccine uptake, their intention to recommend vaccines to patients and the vaccine uptake of their patients. The purpose of this article is to compare how midwives and physicians address vaccination with parents during pregnancy and in postpartum visits. Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with midwives and physicians practicing in the province of Quebec, Canada. Results of our analysis have shown that physicians adopt an "education-information" stance when discussing vaccination with parents in the attempt to "convince" parents to vaccinate. In contrast, midwives adopted a neutral stance and gave information on the pros and cons of vaccination to parents while leaving the final decision up to them. Findings of this study highlight the fact that physicians and midwives have different views regarding their role and responsibilities concerning vaccination. It may be that neither of these approaches is optimal in promoting vaccination uptake.
即便疫苗接种常被视作公共卫生领域的重大成就之一,但近期研究结果表明,家长对疫苗接种的接受度正在下降。医疗服务提供者对疫苗的认知和态度,是影响他们自身接种疫苗、向患者推荐疫苗以及患者接种疫苗情况的重要因素。本文旨在比较助产士和医生在孕期及产后访视中与家长沟通疫苗接种问题的方式。我们对在加拿大魁北克省执业的助产士和医生进行了30次半结构化访谈。分析结果显示,医生在与家长讨论疫苗接种时采取“教育-告知”立场,试图“说服”家长接种疫苗。相比之下,助产士采取中立立场,向家长提供疫苗接种的利弊信息,让家长自行做出最终决定。本研究结果凸显出医生和助产士在疫苗接种的角色和责任方面存在不同观点。或许这两种方法在促进疫苗接种方面都并非最佳。