Suppr超能文献

描述卫生监督访视期间具有疫苗犹豫家长的提供者免疫沟通实践:一项试点研究。

Characterizing providers' immunization communication practices during health supervision visits with vaccine-hesitant parents: a pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2012 Feb 8;30(7):1269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.129. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility of using direct observation of provider-parent immunization discussions and to characterize provider communication practices with vaccine-hesitant parents.

METHODS

Over a 6 month period in 2010, we videotaped immunization discussions between pediatric providers and vaccine-hesitant parents during health supervision visits involving children 2-15 months old (N=24) in the Seattle area, Washington, USA. Videotapes were analyzed using the qualitative method of conversation analysis.

RESULTS

We approached 96 parents seen by 9 different providers. Of those who were eligible (N=56), we enrolled 43% (N=24). Four videotaped visits were excluded from analysis for failure to obtain parental HIPAA authorization. Of the remaining 20 visits, there were ≥2 visits each that involved children aged 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months, and all videotaped visits contained at least a brief immunization discussion. We identified 6 communication practices and several behavior types within each practice relevant to immunization: Practice 1, providers' initiations of the topic of vaccination; Types: participatory or presumptive format; Practice 2, parents' responses to providers' topic initiations; Types: strong or weak acceptance or resistance; Practice 3, providers' follow-ups to parent's responses; Types: no, immediate, or delayed pursuit; Practice 4, parents' vaccine-related questions or statements; Types: fact- or concern-based; Practice 5, providers' explicit solicitations of parent's questions/concerns; Types: designed to discourage or encourage discussion; and Practice 6, parents' responses to providers' solicitations of questions/concerns; Types: no question or fact- or concern-based inquiry.

CONCLUSION

Direct observation of immunization discussions in the primary care pediatric setting is feasible and yields insight into several provider-parent immunization communication practices that are worthy of further study to determine which are effective at improving parental acceptance of immunization.

摘要

目的

确定直接观察提供者-家长免疫讨论的可行性,并描述提供者与疫苗犹豫家长沟通的实践。

方法

在 2010 年的 6 个月期间,我们在华盛顿西雅图地区对参与儿童 2-15 个月健康监督访问的儿科提供者和疫苗犹豫家长进行了免疫讨论的录像,共有 9 名不同的提供者和 24 名家长符合录像条件。录像采用对话分析的定性方法进行分析。

结果

我们接触了 9 位提供者,共 96 名家长,其中符合条件的 56 名家长中,我们招募了 43%(24 名)。由于未能获得家长的 HIPAA 授权,有 4 次录像访问被排除在分析之外。在其余的 20 次访问中,每次访问均涉及 2、4、6、9、12 和 15 个月的儿童,所有录像访问均包含简短的免疫讨论。我们确定了 6 种沟通实践和每种实践中的几种与免疫相关的行为类型:实践 1,提供者发起接种疫苗话题;类型:参与性或假设性格式;实践 2,家长对提供者话题发起的反应;类型:强烈或微弱的接受或抵抗;实践 3,提供者对家长反应的跟进;类型:无、立即或延迟跟进;实践 4,家长的疫苗相关问题或陈述;类型:基于事实或关注;实践 5,提供者明确征求家长的问题/关注;类型:旨在鼓励或鼓励讨论;实践 6,家长对提供者征求问题/关注的反应;类型:无问题或基于事实或关注的查询。

结论

在初级保健儿科环境中直接观察免疫讨论是可行的,可以深入了解几种提供者-家长免疫沟通实践,这些实践值得进一步研究,以确定哪些实践可以有效提高家长对免疫的接受度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验