Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死中的氧疗:它真的是一股清新空气吗?

Oxygen in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Is It Really a Breath of Fresh Air?

作者信息

Loomba Rohit S, Nijhawan Karan, Aggarwal Saurabh, Arora Rohit R

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Wisconsin/Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Cardiology, Milwaukee, WI, USA

Rush University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Mar;21(2):143-9. doi: 10.1177/1074248415598004. Epub 2015 Aug 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Supplemental oxygen has been used in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Once an official recommendation in the guidelines for the management of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, it is now mentioned as an intervention to be considered. Data for the use of supplemental oxygen or AMI are limited, and some data have suggested associated harm.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature and a subsequent meta-analysis of the data to determine the effect of high concentration oxygen versus titrated oxygen or room air in the setting of AMI. The following end points were studied: in-hospital mortality, opiate use, percentage of infarcted myocardium by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and mass of infarcted myocardium by MRI.

RESULTS

No significant difference was noted with end points when comparing those randomized to high-concentration oxygen versus those randomized to titrated oxygen or room air in the setting of AMI. No significant publication bias was identified although this could not be assessed for all end points.

CONCLUSION

High-concentration oxygen may not offer any benefit when compared to titrated oxygen or room air. A large, randomized trial is warranted to further delineate these differences with respect to multiple end points.

摘要

引言

急性心肌梗死(AMI)时已使用补充氧气。它曾是急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死管理指南中的一项官方推荐,现在则被提及为一种可考虑的干预措施。关于补充氧气用于AMI的数据有限,且一些数据表明存在相关危害。

方法

我们对文献进行了系统回顾,并随后对数据进行了荟萃分析,以确定在AMI情况下高浓度氧气与滴定氧气或室内空气相比的效果。研究了以下终点:住院死亡率、阿片类药物使用、磁共振成像(MRI)测定的梗死心肌百分比以及MRI测定的梗死心肌质量。

结果

在AMI情况下,将随机分配至高浓度氧气组与随机分配至滴定氧气或室内空气组的患者的终点进行比较时,未发现显著差异。尽管无法对所有终点进行评估,但未发现显著的发表偏倚。

结论

与滴定氧气或室内空气相比,高浓度氧气可能没有任何益处。有必要进行一项大型随机试验,以进一步明确这些在多个终点方面的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验