Grebla Regina C, Keohane Laura, Lee Yoojin, Lipsitz Lewis A, Rahman Momotazur, Trivedi Amal N
Regina C. Grebla is a researcher in the Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research at Brown University, in Providence, Rhode Island, and associate director of the Global Health Economics, Outcomes Research, and Epidemiology Division at Shire, in Lexington, Massachusetts.
Laura Keohane is a PhD candidate in the Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice at the Brown University School of Public Health.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Aug;34(8):1324-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0054.
The traditional Medicare program requires an enrollee to have a hospital stay of at least three consecutive calendar days to qualify for coverage of subsequent postacute care in a skilled nursing facility. This long-standing policy, implemented to discourage premature discharges from hospitals, might now be inappropriately lengthening hospital stays for patients who could be transferred sooner. To assess the implications of eliminating the three-day qualifying stay requirement, we compared hospital and postacute skilled nursing facility utilization among Medicare Advantage enrollees in matched plans that did or did not eliminate that requirement in 2006-10. Among hospitalized enrollees with a skilled nursing facility admission, the mean hospital length-of-stay declined from 6.9 days to 6.7 days for those no longer subject to the qualifying stay but increased from 6.1 to 6.6 days among those still subject to it, for a net decline of 0.7 day when the three-day stay requirement was eliminated. The elimination was not associated with more hospital or skilled nursing facility admissions or with longer lengths-of-stay in a skilled nursing facility. These findings suggest that eliminating the three-day stay requirement conferred savings on Medicare Advantage plans and that study of the requirement in traditional Medicare plans is warranted.
传统的医疗保险计划要求参保人住院至少连续三个日历日,才有资格享受后续在专业护理机构接受急性后期护理的保险待遇。这一长期实施的政策旨在防止医院过早出院,但现在可能不适当地延长了那些本可更快转院的患者的住院时间。为评估取消三日合格住院要求的影响,我们比较了2006 - 2010年期间,在有或没有取消该要求的匹配医保优势计划中,参保人的医院及急性后期专业护理机构的使用情况。在入住专业护理机构的住院参保人中,不再受合格住院要求限制的人平均住院时长从6.9天降至6.7天,而仍受该要求限制的人平均住院时长从6.1天增至6.6天。取消三日住院要求后,净减少了0.7天。取消该要求与更多的医院或专业护理机构入院情况无关,也与在专业护理机构更长的住院时长无关。这些发现表明,取消三日住院要求为医保优势计划节省了费用,对传统医疗保险计划中该要求进行研究是有必要的。