Wei Xiaolin, Li Haitao, Yang Nan, Wong Samuel Y S, Chong Marc C S, Shi Leiyu, Wong Martin C S, Xu Jianguang, Zhang Dan, Tang Jinling, Li Donald K T, Meng Qingyue, Griffiths Sian M
2/F School of Public Health, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), China .
School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States of America .
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Jun 1;93(6):407-16. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.139527. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
To assess changes in the quality of primary care in two megacities following the introduction of health system reforms in China.
We conducted multistage stratified random face-to-face surveys of patients visiting community health centres in Shanghai in 2011 and 2013, and Shenzhen in 2012 and 2013. Quality of primary care was measured using an assessment tool. Difference-in-difference analyses based on multiple linear regressions were used to compare the changes over time, after controlling for potential confounders.
Most (2721) of the 3214 participants used a community health centre as their regular source of care and were included in our analyses. The mean total scores for quality of primary care were similar for Shanghai and Shenzhen at baseline. In Shenzhen, the mean total scores for all participants and those on low incomes had worsened by 0.922 (95% CI: 0.629 to 1.215) and 1.203 (95% CI: 0.397 to 2.009), respectively. In Shanghai, however, there were improvements in the mean total scores which included increases in the scores for first-contact utilization, continuity, coordination of information and comprehensiveness.
The quality of primary care improved in Shanghai but not in Shenzhen. This may be because, in Shanghai, beneficial long-term relationships between patients and general practitioners were supported by capitation payments and the provision of services tailored to the local health priorities.
评估中国实施卫生系统改革后两个特大城市基层医疗服务质量的变化。
我们于2011年和2013年在上海,以及2012年和2013年在深圳,对前往社区卫生中心就诊的患者进行了多阶段分层随机面对面调查。使用评估工具来衡量基层医疗服务质量。在控制潜在混杂因素后,基于多元线性回归的差分分析用于比较随时间的变化。
3214名参与者中的大多数(2721名)将社区卫生中心作为其常规医疗服务来源,并纳入我们的分析。上海和深圳在基线时基层医疗服务质量的平均总分相似。在深圳,所有参与者和低收入参与者的平均总分分别下降了0.922(95%置信区间:0.629至1.215)和1.203(95%置信区间:0.397至2.009)。然而,在上海,平均总分有所提高,包括首次就诊利用率、连续性、信息协调性和全面性得分的增加。
上海的基层医疗服务质量有所提高,而深圳则没有。这可能是因为在上海,按人头付费以及根据当地卫生重点提供服务,支持了患者与全科医生之间有益的长期关系。