Osteoporosis and Bone Biology, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Australia, Sydney, Australia.
J Bone Miner Res. 2016 Feb;31(2):274-80. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2611. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
Fracture risk estimates are usually based on femoral neck (FN) BMD. It is unclear how to address T-score discordance, where lumbar spine (LS) T-score is lower than FN T-score. The objective of this work was to examine the impact of LS BMD on fracture risk, in individuals with lower LS T-score than FN T-score. Participants aged 60+ years from the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study with LS and FN BMD measured at first visit, and were followed from 1989 to 2014. Five-hundred and seventy-three (573) of 2270 women and 131 of 1373 men had lower LS than FN T-score by ≥ 0.6 standard deviation (SD) (low-LS group based on least significant change). In low-LS women, each 1 SD lower LS T-score than FN was associated with a 30% increase in fracture risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.30; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.45). For low-LS men there was a 20% nonsignificant increase in fracture risk for each 1 SD lower LS than FN T-score (HR 1.20; 95% CI, 0.10 to 1.67). Low-LS women had greater absolute fracture risks than the rest of the women. This increased risk was more apparent for lower levels of FN T-score and in older age groups. At an FN T-score of -2, low-LS women had a 3%, 10%, and 23% higher 5-year absolute fracture risk than non-low LS women in the 60 to 69 year, 70 to 79 year, and 80+ years age-groups, respectively. Furthermore, an osteoporotic LS T-score increased 5-year absolute fracture risk for women with normal or osteopenic FN T-score by 10% to 13%. Men in the low-LS group had very few fractures; therefore, a meaningful analyses of fracture risk could not be conducted. This study shows the significant contribution of lower LS BMD to fracture risk over and above FN BMD in women. A LS BMD lower than FN BMD should be incorporated into fracture risk calculators at least for women in older age-groups.
骨折风险评估通常基于股骨颈(FN)BMD。目前尚不清楚如何解决腰椎(LS)T 评分低于 FN T 评分的 T 评分差异问题。本研究旨在探讨 LS BMD 对 LS T 评分低于 FN T 评分的个体骨折风险的影响。在 1989 年至 2014 年期间,来自 Dubbo 骨质疏松症流行病学研究的年龄在 60 岁及以上、首次就诊时测量 LS 和 FN BMD 的参与者中,573 名女性(2270 名中的 573 名)和 131 名男性(1373 名中的 131 名)的 LS T 评分低于 FN T 评分≥0.6 个标准差(SD)(基于最小有意义变化的低 LS 组)。在低 LS 女性中,LS T 评分比 FN 每降低 1 个 SD,骨折风险增加 30%(风险比[HR]1.30;95%CI,1.11 至 1.45)。对于低 LS 男性,LS 比 FN 每降低 1 个 SD,骨折风险增加 20%(HR 1.20;95%CI,0.10 至 1.67)。低 LS 女性的绝对骨折风险高于其余女性。这种风险增加在 FN T 评分较低和年龄较大的人群中更为明显。在 FN T 评分为-2 时,60 至 69 岁、70 至 79 岁和 80 岁及以上年龄组的低 LS 女性的 5 年绝对骨折风险分别比非低 LS 女性高 3%、10%和 23%。此外,LS 骨质疏松症 T 评分增加了正常或骨量减少的 FN T 评分女性的 5 年绝对骨折风险 10%至 13%。低 LS 组男性骨折发生较少;因此,无法对骨折风险进行有意义的分析。本研究表明,在女性中,LS BMD 对骨折风险的贡献明显高于 FN BMD。对于年龄较大的女性,至少应将 LS BMD 低于 FN BMD 纳入骨折风险计算器。