Department for Ecological Modelling, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany; Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Department of Economics, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Germany.
J Environ Manage. 2015 Oct 1;162:179-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.047. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
Management strategies in rotational grazing systems differ in their level of complexity and adaptivity. Different components of such grazing strategies are expected to allow for adaptation to environmental heterogeneities in space and time. However, most models investigating general principles of rangeland management strategies neglect spatio-temporal system properties including seasonality and spatial heterogeneity of environmental variables. We developed an ecological-economic rangeland model that combines a spatially explicit farm structure with intra-annual time steps. This allows investigating different management components in rotational grazing systems (including stocking and rotation rules) and evaluating their effect on the ecological and economic states of semi-arid grazing systems. Our results show that adaptive stocking is less sensitive to overstocking compared to a constant stocking strategy. Furthermore, the rotation rule becomes important only at stocking numbers that maximize expected income. Altogether, the best of the tested strategies is adaptive stocking combined with a rotation that adapts to both spatial forage availability and seasonality. This management strategy maximises mean income and at the same time maintains the rangeland in a viable condition. However, we could also show that inappropriate adaptation that neglects seasonality even leads to deterioration. Rangelands characterised by higher inter-annual climate variability show a higher risk of income losses under a non-adaptive stocking rule, and non-adaptive rotation is least able to buffer increasing climate variability. Overall, all important system properties including seasonality and spatial heterogeneity of available resources need to be considered when designing an appropriate rangeland management system. Resulting adaptive rotational grazing strategies can be valuable for improving management and mitigating income risks.
轮牧系统中的管理策略在复杂性和适应性方面存在差异。这些放牧策略的不同组成部分预计将允许适应空间和时间上的环境异质性。然而,大多数研究牧场管理策略一般原则的模型忽略了包括季节性和环境变量空间异质性在内的时空系统特性。我们开发了一个生态经济牧场模型,该模型将空间上明确的农场结构与年内时间步骤相结合。这允许研究轮牧系统中的不同管理组件(包括放养和轮牧规则),并评估它们对半干旱放牧系统生态和经济状态的影响。我们的研究结果表明,与恒定放养策略相比,适应性放养对过牧的敏感性较低。此外,只有在放养数量最大化预期收入时,轮牧规则才变得重要。总的来说,所测试策略中最好的是适应性放养与适应空间牧草可用性和季节性的轮牧相结合的策略。这种管理策略可以最大化平均收入,同时保持牧场处于可行状态。然而,我们还可以表明,忽视季节性的不当适应甚至会导致恶化。在非适应性放养规则下,年际气候变率较高的牧场面临更高的收入损失风险,而非适应性轮牧最无法缓冲气候变率的增加。总的来说,在设计适当的牧场管理系统时,需要考虑包括季节性和资源空间异质性在内的所有重要系统特性。由此产生的适应性轮牧策略可以为改善管理和减轻收入风险提供宝贵的参考。