Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
J Environ Manage. 2013 Oct 15;128:699-717. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.064. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
Maintaining or enhancing the productive capacity and resilience of rangeland ecosystems is critical for the continued support of people who depend on them for their livelihoods, especially in the face of climatic change. This is also necessary for the continued delivery of ecosystem services derived from rangelands for the broader benefit of societies around the world. Multi-paddock grazing management has been recommended since the mid-20th century as an important tool to adaptively manage rangelands ecosystems to sustain productivity and improve animal management. Moreover, there is much anecdotal evidence from producers that, if applied appropriately, multi-paddock grazing can improve forage and livestock production. By contrast, recent reviews of published rangeland-based grazing systems studies have concluded that, in general, field trials show no superiority of vegetation or animal production in multi-paddock grazing relative to continuous yearlong stocking of single-paddock livestock production systems. Our goal is to provide a framework for rangeland management decisions that support the productivity and resiliency of rangelands and then to identify why different perceptions exist among rangeland managers who have effectively used multi-paddock grazing systems and research scientists who have studied them. First, we discuss the ecology of grazed ecosystems under free-ranging herbivores and under single-paddock fenced conditions. Second, we identify five principles underpinning the adaptive management actions used by successful grazing managers and the ecological, physiological, and behavioral framework they use to achieve desired conservation, production, and financial goals. Third, we examine adaptive management principles needed to successfully manage rangelands subjected to varying environmental conditions. Fourth, we describe the differences between the interpretation of results of grazing systems research reported in the scientific literature and the results reported by successful grazing managers; we highlight the shortcomings of most of the previously conducted grazing systems research for providing information relevant for rangeland managers who aim to achieve desired environmental and economic goals. Finally, we outline knowledge gaps and present testable hypotheses to broaden our understanding of how planned multi-paddock grazing management can be used at the ranching enterprise scale to facilitate the adaptive management of rangelands under dynamic environmental conditions.
维持或增强草原生态系统的生产力和弹性对于那些依赖草原维持生计的人来说至关重要,特别是在面对气候变化的情况下。这也是为了继续提供草原生态系统提供的生态系统服务,以造福全世界的社会。自 20 世纪中叶以来,多围场放牧管理一直被推荐为一种重要的工具,用于自适应管理草原生态系统,以维持生产力并改善动物管理。此外,生产者有很多经验证据表明,如果适当应用,多围场放牧可以提高饲料和牲畜产量。相比之下,最近对已发表的基于草原的放牧系统研究的综述得出的结论是,一般来说,田间试验表明,多围场放牧在植被或动物生产方面并不优于单围场牲畜生产系统的连续全年放牧。我们的目标是提供一个支持草原生产力和弹性的草原管理决策框架,然后确定为什么在有效使用多围场放牧系统的草原管理者和研究过这些系统的研究科学家之间存在不同的看法。首先,我们讨论了在自由放牧的食草动物和单围场围栏条件下放牧生态系统的生态学。其次,我们确定了成功放牧管理者使用的适应性管理行动的五个原则,以及他们用来实现所需的保护、生产和财务目标的生态、生理和行为框架。第三,我们研究了成功管理受不同环境条件影响的草原所需的适应性管理原则。第四,我们描述了在科学文献中报告的放牧系统研究结果与成功放牧管理者报告的结果之间的差异;我们强调了以前进行的大多数放牧系统研究在提供对旨在实现所需环境和经济目标的草原管理者相关信息方面的不足。最后,我们概述了知识差距,并提出了可检验的假设,以扩大我们对计划中的多围场放牧管理如何在牧场企业规模上用于促进动态环境条件下草原的适应性管理的理解。