Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States of America.
AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, Vernon, TX, United States of America.
PeerJ. 2022 Jul 19;10:e13750. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13750. eCollection 2022.
Measurement of two grazing management's influence on pasture productivity, soil food web structure, soil organic carbon and soil microbial respiration efficiency was conducted on five southeastern US, across-the-fence ranch pairs to compare adaptive multi-paddock grazing (AMP) management, using short grazing events with planned, adaptive recovery periods, to conventional grazing (CG) management, with continuous grazing at low stock density.
A point-in-time experimental field analysis was conducted to compare five AMP or CG ranch pairs to better understand the influence of grazing management on (a) standing crop biomass productivity; (b) soil food web community population, structure and functionality; (c) soil organic carbon accrual; and d) soil-C (CO) respiration kinetics.
AMP grazing systems outperformed CG systems by generating: (a) 92.68 g m more standing crop biomass (SCB), promoting 46% higher pasture photosynthetic capacity (Two sample Mann-Whitney; Z = 6.1836; no DF in MW; = 6.26 × 10; Effect size = 0.35) (b) a strong positive linear relationship of SCB with fungal biomass (R = 0.9915; F(1,3) = 175.35; = 0.015); fungal to bacterial (F:B) biomass ratio (R = 0.9616; F(1,3) = 36.75; = 0.009) and a soil food web proxy (R = 0.9616; F(1,3) = 36.75; = 0.009) and a concurrent very strong inverse relationship with bacteria biomass (R = -0.946; F(1,3) = 25.56; = 0.015); (c) significant predator/prey interactions with an inverse relationship with bacterial population biomass ( = - 0.946; F(1,3) = 25.56; = 0.015) and a positive relationship with total protozoa enumeration (R = 0.9826; F(1,3) = 83.68; = 0.003) when compared to SCB; (d) a 19.52% reduction in soil C (CO) respiration rates (Two sample -test; T = -2.3581; DF = 52.3541; = 0.0221; Effect size = 0.59); and (e) a 20.6% increase in soil organic carbon (SOC) in the top 10 cm of soil profile (Two sample Mann-Whitney; Z = 2.6507; no DF in MW; = 0.008; Effect size = 0.24). Rancher conversion to AMP grazing strategies would appear to regenerate soil food web population, structure, diversity and biological functionality helping to improve: carbon flow into plant biomass, buildup of soil carbon, predator/prey nutrient cycling and soil microbial respiration efficiency while offering improved climate resilience and a strategy to increase the capture and storage of atmospheric CO in soils of the world's rangeland.
为了比较自适应多围场放牧(AMP)管理和传统放牧(CG)管理对牧场生产力、土壤食物网结构、土壤有机碳和土壤微生物呼吸效率的影响,在东南美国的五个跨围栏牧场对两种放牧管理进行了测量,AMP 管理采用短放牧事件和计划的自适应恢复期,而 CG 管理则以低牲畜密度进行连续放牧。
进行了一次现场实验分析,以比较五个 AMP 或 CG 牧场对更好地了解放牧管理对(a)立作物生物量生产力;(b)土壤食物网群落种群、结构和功能;(c)土壤有机碳积累;和(d)土壤-C(CO)呼吸动力学的影响。
AMP 放牧系统表现优于 CG 系统,产生:(a)92.68 g m 更多的立作物生物量(SCB),促进 46%更高的牧场光合作用能力(双样本曼-惠特尼;Z = 6.1836;MW 中无 DF;= 6.26×10;效应大小= 0.35)(b)SCB 与真菌生物量呈强正线性关系(R = 0.9915;F(1,3)= 175.35;= 0.015);真菌与细菌(F:B)生物量比(R = 0.9616;F(1,3)= 36.75;= 0.009)和土壤食物网代理(R = 0.9616;F(1,3)= 36.75;= 0.009)和与细菌生物量呈强负相关(R = -0.946;F(1,3)= 25.56;= 0.015);(c)显著的捕食者/猎物相互作用,与细菌种群生物量呈负相关(= -0.946;F(1,3)= 25.56;= 0.015),与总原生动物计数呈正相关(R = 0.9826;F(1,3)= 83.68;= 0.003)与 SCB 相比;(d)土壤-C(CO)呼吸速率降低 19.52%(双样本 t 检验;T = -2.3581;DF = 52.3541;= 0.0221;效应大小= 0.59)和(e)土壤有机碳(SOC)在土壤剖面顶部 10 cm 中增加 20.6%(双样本曼-惠特尼;Z = 2.6507;MW 中无 DF;= 0.008;效应大小= 0.24)。牧场主向 AMP 放牧策略的转变似乎可以恢复土壤食物网种群、结构、多样性和生物功能,有助于改善:植物生物量中碳的流动、土壤碳的积累、捕食者/猎物的养分循环和土壤微生物呼吸效率,同时提供了增强的气候恢复力和增加大气 CO 在世界牧场土壤中的捕获和储存的策略。