Suppr超能文献

证据不足以证实中低收入地区进行糖尿病和高血压人群筛查的价值。

Evidence insufficient to confirm the value of population screening for diabetes and hypertension in low- and-middle-income settings.

作者信息

Durão Solange, Ajumobi Oluwayemisi, Kredo Tamara, Naude Celeste, Levitt Naomi S, Steyn Krisela, Bradshaw Debbie, Young Taryn

机构信息

South African Cochrane Centre, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town South Africa.

出版信息

S Afr Med J. 2015 Jan 8;105(2):98-102. doi: 10.7196/samj.8819.

Abstract

To assess the evidence from systematic reviews on the effect on morbidity and mortality of blanket screening for hypertension or diabetes mellitus compared with targeted, opportunistic or no screening, we searched for relevant systematic reviews and conducted duplicate study selection, data extraction and quality appraisal. Results were summarised narratively. We included two completed reviews of moderate quality and one ongoing Cochrane review. In one completed review, general health checks had no effect on total morbidity or mortality or on healthcare services compared with no health checks. In the other, intensive hypertension screening methods were ineffective in increasing screening uptake or detecting new cases compared with less intensive methods. Both reviews included studies in high-income settings. There is insufficient evidence from currently available systematic reviews to confirm a beneficial effect of blanket screening for hypertension and/or diabetes compared with other types of screening methods in low- and middle-income settings. Scarce resources are being mobilised to implement mass screening intervention for diabetes and hypertension without adequate evidence of its effects. A systematic review is needed to assess clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and overall impact on the health system of screening strategies, especially in low- and middle-income settings such as exist in South Africa. Robust evaluation of these outcomes would then be necessary to inform secondary prevention strategies.

摘要

为了评估与针对性筛查、机会性筛查或不筛查相比,全面筛查高血压或糖尿病对发病率和死亡率影响的系统评价证据,我们检索了相关系统评价,并进行了重复的研究选择、数据提取和质量评估。结果采用叙述性总结。我们纳入了两项质量中等的已完成评价和一项正在进行的Cochrane评价。在一项已完成评价中,与不进行健康检查相比,一般健康检查对总发病率、死亡率或医疗服务没有影响。在另一项评价中,与不太密集的方法相比,强化高血压筛查方法在提高筛查接受率或发现新病例方面无效。两项评价均纳入了高收入环境中的研究。目前可用的系统评价中没有足够的证据来证实与其他类型的筛查方法相比,全面筛查高血压和/或糖尿病在低收入和中等收入环境中的有益效果。在没有充分证据证明其效果的情况下,正在调动稀缺资源来实施糖尿病和高血压的大规模筛查干预。需要进行系统评价以评估筛查策略的临床效果、成本效益以及对卫生系统的总体影响,特别是在南非这样的低收入和中等收入环境中。然后有必要对这些结果进行有力评估,以为二级预防策略提供依据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验