• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定医疗安全与质量的公司治理:英国医院董事会的一幕剧

Enacting corporate governance of healthcare safety and quality: a dramaturgy of hospital boards in England.

作者信息

Freeman Tim, Millar Ross, Mannion Russell, Davies Huw

机构信息

Leadership, Work and Organisation, Middlesex University, UK.

Health Services Management Centre, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Sociol Health Illn. 2016 Feb;38(2):233-51. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12309. Epub 2015 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1111/1467-9566.12309
PMID:26242565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5014173/
Abstract

The governance of patient safety is a challenging concern for all health systems. Yet, while the role of executive boards receives increased scrutiny, the area remains theoretically and methodologically underdeveloped. Specifically, we lack a detailed understanding of the performative aspects at play: what board members say and do to discharge their accountabilities for patient safety. This article draws on qualitative data from overt non-participant observation of four NHS hospital Foundation Trust boards in England. Applying a dramaturgical framework to explore scripting, setting, staging and performance, we found important differences between case study sites in the performative dimensions of processing and interpretation of infection control data. We detail the practices associated with these differences--the legitimation of current performance, the querying of data classification, and the naming and shaming of executives--to consider their implications.

摘要

患者安全管理是所有医疗系统面临的一个具有挑战性的问题。然而,尽管执行委员会的作用受到了越来越多的审查,但该领域在理论和方法上仍未得到充分发展。具体而言,我们对其中发挥作用的实践方面缺乏详细了解:董事会成员为履行其对患者安全的责任而说了什么和做了什么。本文借鉴了对英格兰四个国民保健服务医院基金会信托董事会进行公开非参与式观察的定性数据。应用戏剧化框架来探索脚本、场景、舞台布置和表演,我们发现在感染控制数据的处理和解释的实践维度上,案例研究地点之间存在重要差异。我们详细阐述了与这些差异相关的做法——当前绩效的合法化、数据分类的质疑以及对管理人员的点名批评——以考虑其影响。

相似文献

1
Enacting corporate governance of healthcare safety and quality: a dramaturgy of hospital boards in England.制定医疗安全与质量的公司治理:英国医院董事会的一幕剧
Sociol Health Illn. 2016 Feb;38(2):233-51. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12309. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
2
Overseeing oversight: governance of quality and safety by hospital boards in the English NHS.监督监督:英国国民医疗服务体系中医院董事会对质量与安全的治理
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jan;20(1 Suppl):9-16. doi: 10.1177/1355819614558471.
3
Do Hospital Boards matter for better, safer, patient care?医院董事会对提高医疗质量和保障患者安全有影响吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar;177:278-287. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.045. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
4
Understanding corporate governance of healthcare quality: a comparative case study of eight Australian public hospitals.理解医疗质量的公司治理:对澳大利亚八家公立医院的比较案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 21;19(1):725. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4593-0.
5
Hospital board oversight of quality and safety: a stakeholder analysis exploring the role of trust and intelligence.医院董事会对质量与安全的监督:一项探索信任与信息作用的利益相关者分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun 16;15:196. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0771-x.
6
Governing boards and profound organizational change in hospitals.医院的管理委员会与深刻的组织变革
Med Care Rev. 1989 Summer;46(2):157-87. doi: 10.1177/107755878904600204.
7
Giving voice to quality and safety matters at board level: A qualitative study of the experiences of executive nurses working in England and Wales.在董事会层面发声:对英格兰和威尔士任职执行护士的经验的定性研究
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Jul;59:169-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
8
Governance of healthcare quality: exploring the relationships between hospital board performance and healthcare quality outcomes.医疗质量治理:探索医院董事会绩效与医疗质量结果之间的关系。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2024 Nov 14;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):25-41. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-09-2023-0065.
9
A survey of board chairs of English hospitals shows greater attention to quality of care than among their US counterparts.一项针对英国医院董事会主席的调查显示,他们比美国同行更加关注医疗护理质量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Apr;32(4):677-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1060.
10
Governance. Opening up to close scrutiny.
Health Serv J. 2012 Oct 18;122(6325):25.

引用本文的文献

1
The Integrated Care World is a Stage: Applying Goffman's Theory of Dramaturgy to the Activities of Integrated Care.整合照护世界如同一台戏:将戈夫曼的拟剧理论应用于整合照护活动
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Aug 26;24(3):17. doi: 10.5334/ijic.8639. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
2
Understanding corporate governance of healthcare quality: a comparative case study of eight Australian public hospitals.理解医疗质量的公司治理:对澳大利亚八家公立医院的比较案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 21;19(1):725. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4593-0.
3
From embracing to managing risks.从拥抱风险到管理风险。
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 25;8(11):e022921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022921.
4
Explaining organisational responses to a board-level quality improvement intervention: findings from an evaluation in six providers in the English National Health Service.解释组织对董事会层面质量改进干预措施的反应:来自英格兰国民保健服务体系中六家提供者评估的结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Mar;28(3):198-204. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008291. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
5
False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice.虚假的曙光与患者安全研究和实践的新视野。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Dec 1;6(12):685-689. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.115.
6
Do Hospital Boards matter for better, safer, patient care?医院董事会对提高医疗质量和保障患者安全有影响吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar;177:278-287. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.045. Epub 2017 Jan 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Overseeing oversight: governance of quality and safety by hospital boards in the English NHS.监督监督:英国国民医疗服务体系中医院董事会对质量与安全的治理
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jan;20(1 Suppl):9-16. doi: 10.1177/1355819614558471.
2
Safety lessons: shifting paradigms and new directions for patient safety research.安全经验教训:患者安全研究的范式转变与新方向
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Jan;20(1 Suppl):1-8. doi: 10.1177/1355819614558340.
3
Is having quality as an item on the executive board agenda associated with the implementation of quality management systems in European hospitals: a quantitative analysis.将质量作为执行委员会会议议程的一项内容是否与欧洲医院质量管理体系的实施相关联:一项定量分析。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Apr;26 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):92-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu017. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
4
Hospital board oversight of quality and patient safety: a narrative review and synthesis of recent empirical research.医院董事会对质量和患者安全的监督:近期实证研究的叙述性回顾和综合。
Milbank Q. 2013 Dec;91(4):738-70. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12032.
5
A survey of board chairs of English hospitals shows greater attention to quality of care than among their US counterparts.一项针对英国医院董事会主席的调查显示,他们比美国同行更加关注医疗护理质量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Apr;32(4):677-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1060.
6
Governance around quality of care at hospitals that disproportionately care for black patients.医院治理与对黑人群体服务比例过高的医院的护理质量
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Mar;27(3):297-303. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1880-9. Epub 2011 Sep 24.
7
Enhancing board oversight on quality of hospital care: an agency theory perspective.强化董事会对医院护理质量的监督:一个代理理论视角。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2012 Apr-Jun;37(2):144-53. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182224237.
8
Policy and practice in the use of root cause analysis to investigate clinical adverse events: mind the gap.运用根本原因分析法调查临床不良事件的政策与实践:关注差距。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(2):217-25. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 May 27.
9
The relationship between external and local governance systems: the case of health care associated infections and medication errors in one NHS trust.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):e45. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.037473. Epub 2010 Jun 27.
10
Narrative review of the UK Patient Safety Research Portfolio.英国患者安全研究组合的叙述性综述。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010 Jan;15 Suppl 1:26-32. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009042.