Landry Benjamin D, Clarke David C, Lee Michael J
Program in Systems Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6 Canada.
J Mol Biol. 2015 Oct 23;427(21):3416-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.07.021. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
In the gulf between genotype and phenotype exists proteins and, in particular, protein signal transduction systems. These systems use a relatively limited parts list to respond to a much longer list of extracellular, environmental, and/or mechanical cues with rapidity and specificity. Most signaling networks function in a highly non-linear and often contextual manner. Furthermore, these processes occur dynamically across space and time. Because of these complexities, systems and "OMIC" approaches are essential for the study of signal transduction. One challenge in using OMIC-scale approaches to study signaling is that the "signal" can take different forms in different situations. Signals are encoded in diverse ways such as protein-protein interactions, enzyme activities, localizations, or post-translational modifications to proteins. Furthermore, in some cases, signals may be encoded only in the dynamics, duration, or rates of change of these features. Accordingly, systems-level analyses of signaling may need to integrate multiple experimental and/or computational approaches. As the field has progressed, the non-triviality of integrating experimental and computational analyses has become apparent. Successful use of OMIC methods to study signaling will require the "right" experiments and the "right" modeling approaches, and it is critical to consider both in the design phase of the project. In this review, we discuss common OMIC and modeling approaches for studying signaling, emphasizing the philosophical and practical considerations for effectively merging these two types of approaches to maximize the probability of obtaining reliable and novel insights into signaling biology.
在基因型和表型之间的鸿沟中存在着蛋白质,尤其是蛋白质信号转导系统。这些系统利用相对有限的元件清单,快速且特异地响应一系列长得多的细胞外、环境和/或机械信号。大多数信号网络以高度非线性且通常依赖于上下文的方式发挥作用。此外,这些过程在空间和时间上动态发生。由于这些复杂性,系统和“组学”方法对于信号转导研究至关重要。使用组学规模方法研究信号转导的一个挑战在于,“信号”在不同情况下可能呈现不同形式。信号通过多种方式编码,如蛋白质 - 蛋白质相互作用、酶活性、定位或蛋白质的翻译后修饰。此外,在某些情况下,信号可能仅编码于这些特征的动态变化、持续时间或变化速率中。因此,信号转导的系统层面分析可能需要整合多种实验和/或计算方法。随着该领域的发展,整合实验和计算分析的难度已变得明显。成功使用组学方法研究信号转导需要“正确”的实验和“正确”的建模方法,并且在项目设计阶段同时考虑这两者至关重要。在本综述中,我们讨论用于研究信号转导的常见组学和建模方法,强调有效融合这两种方法以最大程度提高获得关于信号转导生物学可靠且新颖见解可能性的哲学和实际考量。