de Lusignan Simon, Liaw Siaw-Teng, Dedman Daniel, Khunti Kamlesh, Sadek Khaled, Jones Simon
University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
University of New South Wales, Australia.
J Innov Health Inform. 2015 Jun 5;22(2):255-64. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v22i2.79.
An algorithm that detects errors in diagnosis, classification or coding of diabetes in primary care computerised medial record (CMR) systems is currently available. However, this was developed on CMR systems that are episode orientated medical records (EOMR); and do not force the user to always code a problem or link data to an existing one. More strictly problem orientated medical record (POMR) systems mandate recording a problem and linking consultation data to them.
To compare the rates of detection of diagnostic accuracy using an algorithm developed in EOMR with a new POMR specific algorithm.
We used data from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database (N = 2,466,364) to identify a population of 100,513 (4.08%) patients considered likely to have diabetes. We recalibrated algorithms designed to classify cases of diabetes to take account of that POMR enforced coding consistency in the computerised medical record systems [In Practice Systems (InPS) Vision] that contribute data to THIN. We explored the different proportions of people classified as having type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and with diabetes unclassifiable as either T1DM or T2DM. We compared proportions using chi-square tests and used Tukey's test to compare the characteristics of the people in each group.
The prevalence of T1DM using the original EOMR algorithm was 0.38% (9,264/2,466,364), and for T2DM 3.22% (79,417/2,466,364). The prevalence using the new POMR algorithm was 0.31% (7,750/2,466,364) T1DM and 3.65% (89,990/2,466,364) T2DM. The EOMR algorithms also left more people unclassified 11,439 (12%), as to their type of diabetes compared with 2,380 (2.4%), for the new algorithm. Those people who were only classified by the EOMR system differed in terms of older age, and apparently better glycaemic control, despite not being prescribed medication for their diabetes (p < 0.005).
Increasing the degree of problem orientation of the medical record system can improve the accuracy of recording of diagnoses and, therefore, the accuracy of using routinely collected data from CMRs to determine the prevalence of diabetes mellitus; data processing strategies should reflect the degree of problem orientation.
目前已有一种算法可检测初级医疗保健计算机化病历(CMR)系统中糖尿病诊断、分类或编码的错误。然而,该算法是在以事件为导向的病历(EOMR)的CMR系统上开发的,且不强制用户始终对问题进行编码或将数据链接到现有问题。更严格的问题导向型病历(POMR)系统要求记录问题并将会诊数据与之关联。
比较使用在EOMR中开发的算法与新的POMR特定算法检测诊断准确性的比率。
我们使用了健康改善网络(THIN)数据库中的数据(N = 2,466,364),以识别100,513名(4.08%)被认为可能患有糖尿病的患者群体。我们重新校准了旨在对糖尿病病例进行分类的算法,以考虑到POMR在为THIN提供数据的计算机化医疗记录系统[实践系统(InPS)Vision]中强制实施的编码一致性。我们探讨了被分类为1型糖尿病(T1DM)或2型糖尿病(T2DM)以及糖尿病无法分类为T1DM或T2DM的人群的不同比例。我们使用卡方检验比较比例,并使用Tukey检验比较每组人群的特征。
使用原始EOMR算法时,T1DM的患病率为0.38%(9,264/2,466,364),T2DM的患病率为3.22%(79,417/2,466,364)。使用新的POMR算法时,T1DM的患病率为0.31%(7,750/2,466,364),T2DM的患病率为3.65%(89,990/2,466,364)。与新算法的2,380人(2.4%)相比,EOMR算法还使更多人(11,439人,12%)的糖尿病类型未分类。那些仅由EOMR系统分类的人在年龄较大方面存在差异,并且尽管未接受糖尿病药物治疗,但血糖控制显然更好(p < 0.005)。
提高病历系统的问题导向程度可以提高诊断记录的准确性,从而提高使用CMR中常规收集的数据来确定糖尿病患病率的准确性;数据处理策略应反映问题导向程度。