Sharma Manuj, Petersen Irene, Nazareth Irwin, Coton Sonia J
Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Oct 12;8:373-380. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S113415. eCollection 2016.
Research into diabetes mellitus (DM) often requires a reproducible method for identifying and distinguishing individuals with type 1 DM (T1DM) and type 2 DM (T2DM).
To develop a method to identify individuals with T1DM and T2DM using UK primary care electronic health records.
Using data from The Health Improvement Network primary care database, we developed a two-step algorithm. The first algorithm step identified individuals with potential T1DM or T2DM based on diagnostic records, treatment, and clinical test results. We excluded individuals with records for rarer DM subtypes only. For individuals to be considered diabetic, they needed to have at least two records indicative of DM; one of which was required to be a diagnostic record. We then classified individuals with T1DM and T2DM using the second algorithm step. A combination of diagnostic codes, medication prescribed, age at diagnosis, and whether the case was incident or prevalent were used in this process. We internally validated this classification algorithm through comparison against an independent clinical examination of The Health Improvement Network electronic health records for a random sample of 500 DM individuals.
Out of 9,161,866 individuals aged 0-99 years from 2000 to 2014, we classified 37,693 individuals with T1DM and 418,433 with T2DM, while 1,792 individuals remained unclassified. A small proportion were classified with some uncertainty (1,155 [3.1%] of all individuals with T1DM and 6,139 [1.5%] with T2DM) due to unclear health records. During validation, manual assignment of DM type based on clinical assessment of the entire electronic record and algorithmic assignment led to equivalent classification in all instances.
The majority of individuals with T1DM and T2DM can be readily identified from UK primary care electronic health records. Our approach can be adapted for use in other health care settings.
糖尿病(DM)研究通常需要一种可重复的方法来识别和区分1型糖尿病(T1DM)和2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者。
开发一种利用英国初级保健电子健康记录识别T1DM和T2DM患者的方法。
利用健康改善网络初级保健数据库的数据,我们开发了一种两步算法。第一步算法根据诊断记录、治疗和临床检测结果识别潜在的T1DM或T2DM患者。我们仅排除了患有罕见糖尿病亚型记录的个体。对于被视为糖尿病患者的个体,他们需要至少有两条表明患有糖尿病的记录;其中一条必须是诊断记录。然后,我们使用第二步算法对T1DM和T2DM患者进行分类。在此过程中,使用了诊断代码、所开药物、诊断时年龄以及病例是新发病例还是现患病例的组合。我们通过与对500名糖尿病患者的健康改善网络电子健康记录进行的独立临床检查结果进行比较,对该分类算法进行了内部验证。
在2000年至2014年的9161866名0至99岁个体中,我们将37693名个体分类为T1DM,418433名个体分类为T2DM,同时有1792名个体未分类。由于健康记录不明确,一小部分个体的分类存在一定不确定性(所有T1DM个体中的1155名[3.1%]和T2DM个体中的6139名[1.5%])。在验证过程中,基于对整个电子记录的临床评估进行的糖尿病类型人工赋值与算法赋值在所有情况下都得出了相同的分类结果。
大多数T1DM和T2DM患者可以很容易地从英国初级保健电子健康记录中识别出来。我们的方法可适用于其他医疗保健环境。