Celio Luigi, Bonizzoni Erminio, De Braud Filippo, Agustoni Francesco, Aapro Matti
Medical Oncology Unit 1, Fondazione IRCCS "Istituto Nazionale Tumori", Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Section of Medical Statistics and Biometry, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Mar;24(3):1025-34. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2871-x. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
Data from two noninferiority trials of a dexamethasone-sparing regimen were assessed for the impact of acute nausea and vomiting on delayed outcome in patients undergoing moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) or anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC).
Chemo-naive patients were randomized to receive palonosetron (0.25 mg IV) plus dexamethasone (8 mg IV) on day 1 of chemotherapy, or the same regimen followed by oral dexamethasone on days 2 and 3 in the MEC (n = 237) and AC (n = 380) cohorts. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not they experienced vomiting and/or moderate-to-severe nausea during the acute phase (high- and low-risk groups, respectively). Primary efficacy endpoint was the complete protection (CP) against delayed vomiting and moderate-to-severe nausea. Patient's satisfaction (0-100 mm visual analog scale) was also analyzed.
Among the 209 low-risk patients undergoing MEC, delayed CP occurred in 82.9% of those who received single-dose dexamethasone and 89.8% of those who received 3-day dexamethasone (P = 0.165). Of the 271 low-risk patients undergoing AC, CP was achieved in 71.7 % of those treated with single-dose dexamethasone and 84.2% treated with 3-day dexamethasone (P = 0.019). In spite of these observations, the patient satisfaction data was not influenced by dexamethasone regimen. In both cohorts, occurrence of acute vomiting or moderate-to-severe nausea was the key independent-predictor for delayed vomiting or nausea, respectively.
The dexamethasone-sparing regimen provides adequate delayed protection in patients undergoing MEC who are at low risk for delayed symptoms, and can still be discussed for low-risk AC patients as the daily difference in control is modest. Additional dexamethasone doses can be customized on the basis of occurrence or absence of acute symptoms in the first cycle of MEC and even AC.
评估来自两项地塞米松减量方案非劣效性试验的数据,以探讨急性恶心和呕吐对接受中度致吐性化疗(MEC)或蒽环类药物加环磷酰胺(AC)治疗的患者延迟结局的影响。
初治化疗患者被随机分为两组,在化疗第1天接受帕洛诺司琼(0.25mg静脉注射)加地塞米松(8mg静脉注射),或在MEC(n = 237)和AC(n = 380)队列中,同样的方案在第2天和第3天加用口服地塞米松。根据患者在急性期是否经历呕吐和/或中度至重度恶心,将患者分为两组(分别为高风险组和低风险组)。主要疗效终点是预防延迟性呕吐和中度至重度恶心的完全保护(CP)。还分析了患者满意度(0 - 100mm视觉模拟量表)。
在209例接受MEC的低风险患者中,接受单剂量地塞米松的患者延迟性CP发生率为82.9%,接受3天地塞米松治疗的患者为89.8%(P = 0.165)。在271例接受AC的低风险患者中,接受单剂量地塞米松治疗的患者CP实现率为71.7%,接受3天地塞米松治疗的患者为84.2%(P = 0.019)。尽管有这些观察结果,但患者满意度数据不受地塞米松方案的影响。在两个队列中,急性呕吐或中度至重度恶心的发生分别是延迟性呕吐或恶心的关键独立预测因素。
地塞米松减量方案为延迟症状低风险的MEC患者提供了充分的延迟保护,对于低风险的AC患者,由于控制效果的每日差异不大,仍可进行讨论。可根据MEC甚至AC第一个周期中急性症状的有无来定制额外的地塞米松剂量。