Medical Oncology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Aug;19(8):1217-25. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0941-7. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
A phase III trial assessed the efficacy of palonosetron plus dexamethasone given once in preventing acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) following a broad range of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) regimens.
This multicentre, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial evaluated two different treatment groups. One group received palonosetron (0.25 mg intravenously) and dexamethasone (8 mg intravenously) before chemotherapy, while the other was administered the same regimen on day 1 followed by dexamethasone 8 mg orally on days 2 and 3. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR; defined as no emetic episodes and no rescue medication) during the overall phase (days 1-5 after chemotherapy initiation). The non-inferiority margin was predefined as a 15% difference between groups in the primary endpoint.
Of 332 chemotherapy-naïve patients included in the intention-to-treat analysis, 65.1% were female, and 35.2% received anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC)-based regimens. Overall CR rates were 67.5% for those administered dexamethasone only on day 1 (n = 166), and 71.1% for those also administered dexamethasone on days 2 and 3 (n = 166; difference -3.6% (95% confidence interval, -13.5 to 6.3)). CR rates were not significantly different between groups during the acute (0-24 h post-chemotherapy; 88.6% versus 84.3%; P = 0.262) and delayed phases (days 2-5; 68.7% versus 77.7%; P = 0.116).
Palonosetron plus single-dose dexamethasone administered before common MEC regimens provide protection against acute and delayed CINV which is non-inferior to that of palonosetron plus dexamethasone for 3 days. However, the major benefit of the single-day regimen occurs in patients receiving non-AC MEC regimens.
一项 III 期试验评估了帕洛诺司琼联合地塞米松单次给药在预防广泛中度致吐性化疗(MEC)方案后急性和迟发性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)的疗效。
这项多中心、随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验评估了两组不同的治疗方案。一组患者在化疗前接受帕洛诺司琼(0.25mg 静脉注射)和地塞米松(8mg 静脉注射),另一组患者在第 1 天接受相同的方案,然后在第 2 和第 3 天口服地塞米松 8mg。主要终点是总体阶段(化疗开始后第 1-5 天)的完全缓解(CR;定义为无呕吐发作和无解救药物)。非劣效性边界定义为主要终点两组之间的差异为 15%。
在意向治疗分析中,纳入了 332 例化疗初治患者,其中 65.1%为女性,35.2%接受了蒽环类药物加环磷酰胺(AC)方案。仅在第 1 天接受地塞米松治疗的患者的总体 CR 率为 67.5%(n=166),同时在第 2 和第 3 天接受地塞米松治疗的患者的 CR 率为 71.1%(n=166;差异-3.6%(95%置信区间,-13.5 至 6.3))。两组在急性(化疗后 0-24 小时)(88.6%与 84.3%;P=0.262)和迟发性(第 2-5 天)(68.7%与 77.7%;P=0.116)阶段的 CR 率无显著差异。
帕洛诺司琼联合单剂量地塞米松在常见 MEC 方案中的应用,对急性和迟发性 CINV 具有保护作用,其疗效不劣于帕洛诺司琼联合地塞米松 3 天的方案。然而,单一天的方案主要受益于接受非 AC MEC 方案的患者。