Suppr超能文献

宠物糖尿病自我管理:对糖尿病管理结果的影响

PETS-D: Impact on Diabetes Management Outcomes.

作者信息

Sullivan-Bolyai Susan, Crawford Sybil, Bova Carol, Lee Mary, Quintos J B, Johnson Kim, Cullen Karen, Hamm Terri, Bisordi Jean, Ramchandani Neesha, Fletcher Jason, Quinn Diane, Jaffarian Carol, Lipman Terri, Melkus Gail

机构信息

New York University College of Nursing, New York, New York (Dr Sullivan-Bolyai, Ms Ramchandani, Dr Fletcher, Dr Melkus)

University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Worcester, Massachusetts (Dr Crawford, Dr Bova, Dr Lee, Ms Johnson, Ms Cullen, Ms Quinn, Ms Jaffarian)

出版信息

Diabetes Educ. 2015 Oct;41(5):537-49. doi: 10.1177/0145721715598383. Epub 2015 Aug 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of Parent Education Through Simulation-Diabetes (PETS-D; clinical trial registration NCT01517269) for parents of children <13 years old newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes with 3 parent education vignette sessions using human patient simulation (HPS) as compared with formal parent-nurse education sessions (vignette only) regarding diabetes knowledge, problem-solving skills, hypoglycemia fear, anxiety, and self-efficacy.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Subjects were randomized to the HPS parent diabetes education or the vignette-only arm. Using linear mixed modeling, we compared HPS and vignette-only groups at 2, 6, and 14 weeks. Effect modification of treatment by dichotomized child's age (<6 and ≥ 6 years old) and parent education (≤ high school and >high school) was also tested. All analyses were intent to treat and adjusted for baseline outcome level and clustering within site.

RESULTS

We recruited 191 parents (116 children). Mean baseline A1C was 12%. Overall treatment-related differences were modest. There was a statistically significant effect modification of HPS by child's age, with a larger HPS benefit among parents of younger children for several outcomes: A1C (8.16% vs 9.48% in control; P = .006), lower state anxiety (P = .0094), and higher fear of hypoglycemia (P = .03) for parents of children <6 years old in the HPS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Modest treatment-related differences may reflect ceiling/floor effects in many of the outcomes; we also compared HPS with another intervention rather than to usual education. Parents of younger children receiving the intervention may feel more comfortable with lower A1C levels because of management awareness gleaned from the HPS experience. Future research will include a retrospective case-control study of very young children.

摘要

目的

评估通过模拟糖尿病进行家长教育(PETS-D;临床试验注册号NCT01517269)对13岁以下新诊断为1型糖尿病儿童的家长的疗效,该教育通过3次使用人体患者模拟(HPS)的家长教育案例讨论课程进行,与正式的家长-护士教育课程(仅案例讨论)相比,比较两者在糖尿病知识、问题解决技能、低血糖恐惧、焦虑和自我效能方面的差异。

设计与方法

将受试者随机分为HPS家长糖尿病教育组或仅案例讨论组。使用线性混合模型,我们在第2、6和14周比较了HPS组和仅案例讨论组。还测试了按儿童年龄(<6岁和≥6岁)和家长教育程度(≤高中和>高中)对治疗效果的修正。所有分析均采用意向性治疗,并对基线结局水平和站点内聚类进行了调整。

结果

我们招募了191名家长(116名儿童)。平均基线糖化血红蛋白(A1C)为12%。总体治疗相关差异较小。儿童年龄对HPS有统计学显著的效果修正,对于几个结局,年幼儿童的家长从HPS中获益更大:HPS组中<6岁儿童的家长,A1C水平(8.16%对对照组的9.48%;P = 0.006)、状态焦虑较低(P = 0.0094)以及低血糖恐惧较高(P = 0.03)。

结论

适度的治疗相关差异可能反映了许多结局中的天花板/地板效应;我们还将HPS与另一种干预措施进行了比较,而不是与常规教育进行比较。由于从HPS经验中获得的管理意识,接受干预的年幼儿童的家长可能对较低的A1C水平感觉更安心。未来的研究将包括对非常年幼儿童的回顾性病例对照研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验