Toomey E, Hardeman W, Hankonen N, Byrne M, McSharry J, Matvienko-Sikar K, Lorencatto F
Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Health Promotion Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2020 Mar 12;8(1):132-151. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2020.1738935.
Interventions to change behaviour have substantial potential to impact positively on individual and overall public health. Despite an increasing focus on health behaviour change intervention research, interventions do not always have the desired effect on outcomes, while others have diluted effects once implemented into real-life settings. There is little investment into understanding or such interventions work or do not work. Methodological inadequacies of trials of behavioural interventions have been previously suggested as a barrier to the quality and advancement of behavioural research, with intervention fidelity acknowledged as a key area for improvement. However, there is much ambiguity regarding the terminology and conceptualisation of intervention fidelity and a lack of practical guidance regarding how to address it sufficiently, particularly within trials of complex behavioural interventions. This article outlines specific issues concerning intervention fidelity within trials of health behaviour change interventions and suggests practical considerations and specific recommendations for researchers, with examples from the literature presented. Recommendations pertain to (1) clarifying how fidelity is defined and conceptualised, (2) considering fidelity beyond intervention delivery, (3) considering strategies to both enhance and assess fidelity, (4) making use of existing frameworks and guidance, (5) considering the quality and comprehensiveness of fidelity assessment strategies, (6) considering the balance between fidelity and adaptation and (7) reporting the use of fidelity enhancement and assessment strategies and their results. Suggestions for future research to improve our understanding of, and ability to, address fidelity in behaviour change interventions are also provided.
改变行为的干预措施对于个人健康和公众整体健康有着产生积极影响的巨大潜力。尽管对健康行为改变干预研究的关注日益增加,但干预措施并不总是能对结果产生预期效果,而其他一些干预措施在应用于现实生活场景时效果会大打折扣。在理解此类干预措施为何有效或无效方面,投入的研究甚少。行为干预试验的方法学缺陷先前已被认为是行为研究质量提升和发展的障碍,而干预保真度被公认为是一个关键的改进领域。然而,关于干预保真度的术语和概念化存在诸多模糊之处,并且在如何充分解决这一问题方面缺乏实际指导,尤其是在复杂行为干预试验中。本文概述了健康行为改变干预试验中与干预保真度相关的具体问题,并为研究人员提出了实际考量和具体建议,文中还列举了文献中的实例。建议包括:(1)明确保真度的定义和概念化方式;(2)除了干预实施之外,还要考虑保真度;(3)考虑提高和评估保真度的策略;(4)利用现有的框架和指导;(5)考虑保真度评估策略的质量和全面性;(6)考虑保真度与适应性之间的平衡;(7)报告保真度提高和评估策略的使用情况及其结果。本文还提供了未来研究的建议,以增进我们对行为改变干预中保真度的理解以及应对保真度问题的能力。