Masuda Takanori, Funama Yoshinori, Nakaura Takeshi, Imada Naoyuki, Sato Tomoyasu, Yamashita Yukari, Awai Kazuo
From the*Department of Radiological Technology, Tsuchiya General Hospital; †Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima; ‡Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University; §Diagnostic Radiology, Amakusa Medical Center, Kumamoto; and ∥Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tsuchiya General Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015 Nov-Dec;39(6):962-8. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000292.
We delivered the saline chaser via a spiral flow-generating tube or a conventional connecting tube and compared arterial enhancement at computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the lower extremities.
We randomly assigned 100 patients whose ankle bronchial pressure index or clinical symptoms were suspect of peripheral arterial disease to a spiral flow-generating tube (protocol A) or a conventional connecting-tube protocol (protocol B) and performed CTA of the lower extremities. The test bolus was delivered under protocol A or B, and the CT numbers recorded for each protocol were compared. Two radiological technologists visually evaluated the descending genicular artery.
In the test injection, the median CT number for the popliteal artery was significantly higher with protocol A than B (204.5 HU vs. 170.5 HU, P = 0.03). For CTA of the lower extremities, the median CT number for the popliteal artery at the level of the patella was 436.1 HU (range, 259-608 HU) under protocol A; with protocol B, it was 382.9 HU (range, 244-564 HU) (P = 0.02). The visual score assigned in the descending genicular artery was statistically significantly higher under protocol A than B (P = 0.03).
Use of the spiral flow-generating tube increased the effect of the saline chaser and significantly improved arterial enhancement from the abdominal aorta to the arteries of the foot at CTA of the lower extremities.
我们通过螺旋流产生管或传统连接管注入生理盐水冲管,并比较下肢计算机断层血管造影(CTA)时的动脉强化情况。
我们将100名踝肱压力指数或临床症状怀疑患有外周动脉疾病的患者随机分为螺旋流产生管组(方案A)或传统连接管组(方案B),并进行下肢CTA检查。在方案A或B下注入试验团注,比较各方案记录的CT值。两名放射技师对膝降动脉进行视觉评估。
在试验注射中,方案A时腘动脉的CT值中位数显著高于方案B(204.5 HU对170.5 HU,P = 0.03)。对于下肢CTA,在方案A下,髌骨水平腘动脉的CT值中位数为436.1 HU(范围259 - 608 HU);在方案B下为382.9 HU(范围244 - 564 HU)(P = 0.02)。方案A下膝降动脉的视觉评分在统计学上显著高于方案B(P = 0.03)。
使用螺旋流产生管可增强生理盐水冲管的效果,并在下肢CTA时显著改善从腹主动脉到足部动脉的强化。