Magelssen Morten, Pedersen Reidar, Førde Reidun
Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Pb. 1130 Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway.
HEC Forum. 2016 Sep;28(3):205-16. doi: 10.1007/s10730-015-9291-7. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
How may clinical ethics committees (CECs) inspire ethical reflection among healthcare professionals? How may they deal with organizational ethics issues? In recent years, Norwegian CECs have attempted different activites that stretch or go beyond the standard trio of education, consultation, and policy work. We studied the novel activities of Norwegian CECs by examining annual reports and interviewing CEC members. Through qualitative analysis we identified nine categories of novel CEC activities, which we describe by way of examples. In light of the findings, we argue that some novel working methods may be well suited to promote ethical reflection among clinicians, and that the CEC may be a suitable venue for discussing issues of organizational ethics.
临床伦理委员会(CECs)如何激发医疗保健专业人员进行伦理思考?它们如何处理组织伦理问题?近年来,挪威的临床伦理委员会尝试了不同的活动,这些活动扩展或超越了教育、咨询和政策工作这一标准的三重奏。我们通过审查年度报告和采访临床伦理委员会成员来研究挪威临床伦理委员会的新活动。通过定性分析,我们确定了九类新的临床伦理委员会活动,并通过实例进行描述。根据研究结果,我们认为一些新的工作方法可能非常适合促进临床医生的伦理思考,并且临床伦理委员会可能是讨论组织伦理问题的合适场所。