Luleå University of Technology, Sweden.
Umeå University, Sweden.
Nurs Ethics. 2023 Jun;30(4):614-625. doi: 10.1177/09697330231160007. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
On a daily basis, healthcare professionals deal with various ethical issues and it can be difficult to determine how to act best. Clinical ethics support (CES) has been developed to provide support for healthcare professionals dealing with complex ethical issues. A long-term perspective of participating in inter-professional dialogue and reflective-based CES sessions is seemingly sparse in the literature.
The aim was to describe experiences of impact of Inter-professional Ethics Communication in groups (IEC) based on Habermas' theory of communicative actions, after 6 months from the perspective of an inter-professional team.
A qualitative inductive approach was chosen, and individual interviews ( = 13) were conducted. Interview data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.
The participants, 10 females and two males, represented assistant nurses, registered nurses, physicians, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, welfare officers and psychologists. Each had attended at least four IEC sessions.
The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Umeå, Sweden, and it has been undertaken in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.
Overall, the descriptions expressed a perceived achievement of a deepened and integrated ethical awareness that increased the participants' awareness of ethically difficult situations as well as their own ethical thinking, actions and approaches in daily work. Perspectives were shared and the team become more welded. They carried the memories of the reflections within them, which was perceived as supportive when encountered new ethically situations.
Putting words to unarticulated thoughts may stimulate repeated reflections, leading to new insights and alternative thoughts.
The outcome of IEC sessions 6 months following the last session can be described as an incorporated knowledge that enables actions in ethically difficult situations based on an ethical awareness both at a 'We-level' and an 'I-level'.
医护人员每天都会处理各种伦理问题,很难确定如何做出最佳行动。临床伦理支持(CES)的发展是为了为处理复杂伦理问题的医护人员提供支持。从文献中可以看出,长期参与跨专业对话和基于反思的 CES 会议的观点似乎很少。
本研究旨在描述基于哈贝马斯交往行动理论的跨专业伦理沟通小组(IEC)在经历六个月后,从跨专业团队的角度描述对团队的影响。
选择了一种定性的归纳方法,并进行了个人访谈(= 13)。使用定性内容分析对访谈数据进行分析。
参与者为 10 名女性和 2 名男性,代表助理护士、注册护士、医生、职业治疗师、物理治疗师、福利官员和心理学家。每个人都至少参加了四次 IEC 会议。
该研究得到了瑞典于默奥地区伦理审查委员会的批准,并按照赫尔辛基宣言进行。
总体而言,描述表达了一种对深化和综合伦理意识的感知,这种意识增强了参与者对道德困境的认识,以及他们自己在日常工作中的道德思维、行动和方法。分享了观点,团队变得更加紧密。他们将反思的记忆铭记于心,当遇到新的伦理问题时,这些记忆被认为是有帮助的。
将未表达的想法表达出来可能会激发反复的思考,从而产生新的见解和替代想法。
最后一次会议六个月后 IEC 会议的结果可以描述为一种整合的知识,使人们能够在伦理困境中采取行动,这种知识基于一种伦理意识,既存在于“我们”层面,也存在于“我”层面。