Barnes Andrew J, Xu Haiyong, Tseng Chi-Hong, Ang Alfonso, Tallen Louise, Moore Alison A, Marshall Deborah C, Mirkin Michelle, Ransohoff Kurt, Duru O Kenrik, Ettner Susan L
Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Jan;60:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.06.019. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
At-risk drinking, defined as alcohol use that is excessive or potentially harmful in combination with select comorbidities or medications, affects about 10% of older adults in the United States and is associated with higher mortality. The Project SHARE intervention, which uses patient and provider educational materials, physician counseling, and health educator support, was designed to reduce at-risk drinking among this vulnerable population. Although an earlier study showed that this intervention was successful in reducing rates of at-risk drinking, it is unknown whether these reductions translate into improved health and health-related quality of life (HRQL).
The aim of this study was to examine changes in health and HRQL of older adult at-risk drinkers resulting from a patient-provider educational intervention.
A randomized controlled trial to compare the health and HRQL outcomes of patients assigned to the Project SHARE intervention vs. care as usual at baseline, 6- and 12-months post assignment. Control patients received usual care, which may or may not have included alcohol counseling. Intervention group patients received a personalized patient report, educational materials on alcohol and aging, a brief provider intervention, and a telephone health educator intervention.
Current drinkers 60years and older accessing primary care clinics around Santa Barbara, California (N=1049).
Data were collected from patients using baseline, 6- and 12-month mail surveys. Health and HRQL measures included mental and physical component scores (MCS and PCS) based on the Short Form-12v2 (SF-12v2), the SF-6D, which is also based on the SF-12, and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Adjusted associations of treatment assignment with these outcomes were estimated using generalized least squares regressions with random provider effects. Regressions controlled for age group, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, education, household income, home ownership and the baseline value of the dependent variable.
After regression adjustment, the intervention was associated with a 0.58 point (95% CI: -0.06, 1.21) increase in 6-month MCS and a 0.14 point (95% CI: 0.01, 0.26) improvement in 12-month GDS score, compared to the control group. The intervention also increased adjusted SF-6D scores by 0.01 points at both 6 and 12months (6-month 95% CI: 0.01, 0.02; 12-month 95% CI: 0.01, 0.01).
Despite the previously shown effectiveness of the Project SHARE intervention to reduce at-risk drinking among older adults, this effect translated into effects on health and HRQL that were statistically but not necessarily clinically significant. Effects were most prominent for patients who received physician discussions, suggesting that provider counseling may be a critical component of primary care-based interventions targeting at-risk alcohol use.
高危饮酒被定义为过度饮酒或与某些合并症或药物联合使用时具有潜在危害的饮酒行为,影响着美国约10%的老年人,且与更高的死亡率相关。“共享项目”干预措施利用患者和提供者教育材料、医生咨询以及健康教育者支持,旨在减少这一弱势群体中的高危饮酒行为。尽管早期研究表明该干预措施成功降低了高危饮酒率,但尚不清楚这些降低是否转化为健康状况和与健康相关的生活质量(HRQL)的改善。
本研究的目的是检验患者 - 提供者教育干预对老年高危饮酒者健康和HRQL的影响。
一项随机对照试验,比较分配到“共享项目”干预组的患者与基线、分配后6个月和12个月接受常规护理的患者的健康和HRQL结果。对照组患者接受常规护理,其中可能包括也可能不包括酒精咨询。干预组患者收到个性化的患者报告、关于酒精与衰老的教育材料、简短的提供者干预以及电话健康教育者干预。
年龄在60岁及以上、在加利福尼亚州圣巴巴拉市周边初级保健诊所就诊的当前饮酒者(N = 1049)。
通过基线、6个月和12个月的邮件调查收集患者数据。健康和HRQL测量指标包括基于简版12量表第2版(SF - 12v2)的心理和身体成分得分(MCS和PCS)以及同样基于SF - 12的SF - 6D量表,还有老年抑郁量表(GDS)。使用具有随机提供者效应的广义最小二乘回归估计治疗分配与这些结果的调整关联。回归分析控制了年龄组、性别、种族/民族、婚姻状况、教育程度、家庭收入、房屋所有权以及因变量的基线值。
经过回归调整后,与对照组相比,干预措施使6个月时的MCS增加了0.58分(95%置信区间: - 0.06,1.21),12个月时的GDS得分改善了0.14分(95%置信区间:0.01,0.26)。干预措施还使6个月和12个月时的调整后SF - 6D得分均提高了0.01分(6个月95%置信区间:0.01,0.02;12个月95%置信区间:0.01,0.01)。
尽管先前已证明“共享项目”干预措施在减少老年人高危饮酒方面有效,但这种效果转化为对健康和HRQL的影响,在统计学上有意义,但在临床上不一定有显著意义。对于接受医生讨论的患者,效果最为显著,这表明提供者咨询可能是以初级保健为基础的针对高危饮酒行为干预措施的关键组成部分。