• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健管理干预对脓毒症幸存者心理健康相关生活质量的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Effect of a Primary Care Management Intervention on Mental Health-Related Quality of Life Among Survivors of Sepsis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Schmidt Konrad, Worrack Susanne, Von Korff Michael, Davydow Dimitry, Brunkhorst Frank, Ehlert Ulrike, Pausch Christine, Mehlhorn Juliane, Schneider Nico, Scherag André, Freytag Antje, Reinhart Konrad, Wensing Michel, Gensichen Jochen

机构信息

Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany2Center of Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.

Group Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2703-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7207.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2016.7207
PMID:27367877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5122319/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Survivors of sepsis face long-term sequelae that diminish health-related quality of life and result in increased care needs in the primary care setting, such as medication, physiotherapy, or mental health care.

OBJECTIVE

To examine if a primary care-based intervention improves mental health-related quality of life.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial conducted between February 2011 and December 2014, enrolling 291 patients 18 years or older who survived sepsis (including septic shock), recruited from 9 intensive care units (ICUs) across Germany.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized to usual care (n = 143) or to a 12-month intervention (n = 148). Usual care was provided by their primary care physician (PCP) and included periodic contacts, referrals to specialists, and prescription of medication, other treatment, or both. The intervention additionally included PCP and patient training, case management provided by trained nurses, and clinical decision support for PCPs by consulting physicians.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was change in mental health-related quality of life between ICU discharge and 6 months after ICU discharge using the Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36 [range, 0-100; higher ratings indicate lower impairment; minimal clinically important difference, 5 score points]).

RESULTS

The mean age of the 291 patients was 61.6 years (SD, 14.4); 66.2% (n = 192) were men, and 84.4% (n = 244) required mechanical ventilation during their ICU stay (median duration of ventilation, 12 days [range, 0-134]). At 6 and 12 months after ICU discharge, 75.3% (n = 219 [112 intervention, 107 control]) and 69.4% (n = 202 [107 intervention, 95 control]), respectively, completed follow-up. Overall mortality was 13.7% at 6 months (40 deaths [21 intervention, 19 control]) and 18.2% at 12 months (53 deaths [27 intervention, 26 control]). Among patients in the intervention group, 104 (70.3%) received the intervention at high levels of integrity. There was no significant difference in change of mean MCS scores (intervention group mean at baseline, 49.1; at 6 months, 52.9; change, 3.79 score points [95% CI, 1.05 to 6.54] vs control group mean at baseline, 49.3; at 6 months, 51.0; change, 1.64 score points [95% CI, -1.22 to 4.51]; mean treatment effect, 2.15 [95% CI, -1.79 to 6.09]; P = .28).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among survivors of sepsis and septic shock, the use of a primary care-focused team-based intervention, compared with usual care, did not improve mental health-related quality of life 6 months after ICU discharge. Further research is needed to determine if modified approaches to primary care management may be more effective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN61744782.

摘要

重要性

脓毒症幸存者面临长期后遗症,这会降低与健康相关的生活质量,并导致在初级保健环境中护理需求增加,如药物治疗、物理治疗或心理健康护理。

目的

研究基于初级保健的干预措施是否能改善与心理健康相关的生活质量。

设计、设置和参与者:2011年2月至2014年12月进行的随机临床试验,招募了291名18岁及以上的脓毒症(包括脓毒性休克)幸存者,他们来自德国9个重症监护病房(ICU)。

干预措施

参与者被随机分为常规护理组(n = 143)或为期12个月的干预组(n = 148)。常规护理由他们的初级保健医生(PCP)提供,包括定期联系、转诊至专科医生以及药物、其他治疗或两者的处方。干预措施还包括PCP和患者培训、由经过培训的护士提供的病例管理以及咨询医生为PCP提供的临床决策支持。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是使用36项简短健康调查(SF - 36 [范围,0 - 100;评分越高表明损伤越小;最小临床重要差异,5分])的心理成分总结(MCS)来衡量从ICU出院至出院后6个月与心理健康相关的生活质量变化。

结果

291名患者的平均年龄为61.6岁(标准差,14.4);66.2%(n = 192)为男性,84.4%(n = 244)在ICU住院期间需要机械通气(通气中位数持续时间,12天[范围,0 - 134])。在ICU出院后6个月和12个月时,分别有75.3%(n = 219 [112名干预组,107名对照组])和69.4%(n = 202 [107名干预组,95名对照组])完成了随访。6个月时总死亡率为13.7%(40例死亡[21例干预组,19例对照组]),12个月时为18.2%(53例死亡[27例干预组, 26例对照组])。在干预组患者中,104名(70.3%)接受了高度完整的干预。平均MCS评分变化无显著差异(干预组基线时平均为49.1;6个月时为52.9;变化,3.79分[95%置信区间,1.05至6.54],而对照组基线时平均为49.3;6个月时为51.0;变化,1.64分[95%置信区间, - 1.22至4.51];平均治疗效果,2.15 [95%置信区间, - 1.79至6.09];P = 0.28)。

结论和相关性

在脓毒症和脓毒性休克幸存者中,与常规护理相比,采用以初级保健为重点的团队干预措施在ICU出院6个月后并未改善与心理健康相关的生活质量。需要进一步研究以确定对初级保健管理的改进方法是否可能更有效。

试验注册

isrctn.org标识符:ISRCTN61744782。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be65/5122319/34b174e1495d/nihms828698f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be65/5122319/34b174e1495d/nihms828698f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be65/5122319/34b174e1495d/nihms828698f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of a Primary Care Management Intervention on Mental Health-Related Quality of Life Among Survivors of Sepsis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.初级保健管理干预对脓毒症幸存者心理健康相关生活质量的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2703-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7207.
2
Long-Term Courses of Sepsis Survivors: Effects of a Primary Care Management Intervention.脓毒症幸存者的长期病程:初级保健管理干预的效果。
Am J Med. 2020 Mar;133(3):381-385.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.08.033. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
3
Standardized Rehabilitation and Hospital Length of Stay Among Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.急性呼吸衰竭患者的标准化康复与住院时间:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2694-702. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7201.
4
Long-term quality of life after sepsis and predictors of quality of life in survivors with sepsis.脓毒症后的长期生活质量及脓毒症幸存者生活质量的预测因素
Chin J Traumatol. 2018 Aug;21(4):216-223. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
5
[Analysis of the current quality of life status and influencing factors of sepsis survivors in intensive care unit].[重症监护病房脓毒症幸存者当前生活质量状况及影响因素分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Jan;36(1):23-27. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230814-00632.
6
Effect of an advocacy intervention on mental health in Chinese women survivors of intimate partner violence: a randomized controlled trial.倡导干预对中国亲密伴侣暴力女性幸存者心理健康的影响:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2010 Aug 4;304(5):536-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1052.
7
Determinants of Health-Related Quality of Life After ICU: Importance of Patient Demographics, Previous Comorbidity, and Severity of Illness.ICU 后健康相关生活质量的决定因素:患者人口统计学特征、既往合并症和疾病严重程度的重要性。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):594-601. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002952.
8
Effect of In-Bed Leg Cycling and Electrical Stimulation of the Quadriceps on Global Muscle Strength in Critically Ill Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.卧床腿部自行车运动和股四头肌电刺激对危重症成人整体肌肉力量的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Jul 24;320(4):368-378. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.9592.
9
Effect of a Nurse-Led Preventive Psychological Intervention on Symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.护士主导的预防性心理干预对重症患者创伤后应激障碍症状的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Feb 19;321(7):665-675. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0073.
10
Quality of life of survivors from severe sepsis and septic shock may be similar to that of others who survive critical illness.严重脓毒症和感染性休克幸存者的生活质量可能与其他危重病幸存者相似。
Crit Care. 2004 Apr;8(2):R91-8. doi: 10.1186/cc2818. Epub 2004 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions for adult survivors discharged from the intensive care unit: a scoping review.针对从重症监护病房出院的成年幸存者的干预措施:一项范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 16;15(8):e096634. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096634.
2
Proactive Telehealth-Based Sepsis Transition and Recovery Support, Hospital Readmission, and Mortality: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于主动远程医疗的脓毒症过渡与康复支持、医院再入院率及死亡率:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.3699.
3
Effectiveness of targeted post-acute interventions and follow-up services for sepsis survivors: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
2
Readmission diagnoses after hospitalization for severe sepsis and other acute medical conditions.因严重脓毒症和其他急性病症住院后的再入院诊断。
JAMA. 2015 Mar 10;313(10):1055-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1410.
3
Frequency, cost, and risk factors of readmissions among severe sepsis survivors.严重脓毒症幸存者再入院的频率、成本及风险因素。
针对脓毒症幸存者的急性后期干预及随访服务的有效性:一项系统综述
Crit Care. 2025 Aug 8;29(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05585-3.
4
Improving Outcomes in Survivors of Sepsis-The Transition from Secondary to Primary Care, and the Role of Primary Care: A Narrative Review.改善脓毒症幸存者的预后——从二级医疗向初级医疗的过渡以及初级医疗的作用:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 9;14(8):2582. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082582.
5
Health-Related Quality of Life of Adult Sepsis Survivors Following Critical Illness: A Systematic Review.危重症成年脓毒症幸存者的健康相关生活质量:一项系统综述
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Mar 26;7(4):e1238. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001238. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.
6
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024.《2024年日本脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理临床实践指南》
J Intensive Care. 2025 Mar 14;13(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40560-025-00776-0.
7
Sepsis subphenotypes: bridging the gaps in sepsis treatment strategies.脓毒症亚表型:弥合脓毒症治疗策略的差距
Front Immunol. 2025 Feb 6;16:1546474. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1546474. eCollection 2025.
8
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024.《2024年日本脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理临床实践指南》
Acute Med Surg. 2025 Feb 24;12(1):e70037. doi: 10.1002/ams2.70037. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
9
Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Sepsis Care Pathways-Qualitative Pilot Expert Interviews.医疗保健专业人员对脓毒症护理路径的看法——定性试点专家访谈
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 18;14(2):619. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020619.
10
How are Long-Covid, Post-Sepsis-Syndrome and Post-Intensive-Care-Syndrome related? A conceptional approach based on the current research literature.长新冠、败血症后综合征和重症监护后综合征之间有何关联?基于现有研究文献的概念性方法。
Crit Care. 2024 Aug 29;28(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05076-x.
Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):738-46. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000859.
4
Posttraumatic stress disorder in critical illness survivors: a metaanalysis.危重病幸存者创伤后应激障碍的 Meta 分析。
Crit Care Med. 2015 May;43(5):1121-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000882.
5
Long term health-related quality of life in survivors of sepsis in South West Wales: an epidemiological study.威尔士西南部脓毒症幸存者的长期健康相关生活质量:一项流行病学研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 30;9(12):e116304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116304. eCollection 2014.
6
Changing support needs of survivors of complex critical illness and their family caregivers across the care continuum: a qualitative pilot study of Towards RECOVER.复杂危重症幸存者及其家庭照顾者在整个护理连续过程中不断变化的支持需求:迈向康复(Towards RECOVER)的定性试点研究
J Crit Care. 2015 Apr;30(2):242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
7
Exploring the scope of post-intensive care syndrome therapy and care: engagement of non-critical care providers and survivors in a second stakeholders meeting.探索重症监护后综合征治疗与护理的范围:在第二次利益相关者会议中让非重症监护医护人员和幸存者参与进来。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Dec;42(12):2518-26. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000525.
8
Sepsis survivors monitoring and coordination in outpatient health care (SMOOTH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.脓毒症幸存者门诊医疗监测与协调(SMOOTH):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Jul 11;15:283. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-283.
9
Recommendations for intensive care follow-up clinics; report from a survey and conference of Dutch intensive cares.重症监护随访诊所的建议;荷兰重症监护调查与会议报告
Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 Feb;81(2):135-44. Epub 2014 May 14.
10
Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012.2000-2012 年澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护病房严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的死亡率。
JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1308-16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2637.