Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2013 Jan-Feb;21(1):1-17. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0b013e31827fd8aa.
After participating in this educational activity, the reader should be better able to identify the instruments that are currently being used to measure quality of life (QoL) in alcohol abuse and dependence; determine the impact of alcohol abuse and dependence on QoL; and evaluate the impact of treating alcohol abuse and dependence on QoL.
Quality of life, which consists of the physical, mental, and social domains, has been shown to be negatively affected by alcohol abuse and dependence. This review aims to examine QoL in alcohol abuse and dependence by reviewing the instruments used to measure it and by analyzing the impact of alcohol abuse and dependence and of treatment on QoL.
Studies were identified using a database search of PubMed and PsycINFO from the past 40 years (1971-2011) using the following keywords: abuse OR dependence, OR use AND alcohol, AND Quality of Life, QoL, Health-related quality of life, HRQOL. Two authors agreed independently on including 50 studies that met specific selection criteria.
Although several global measures of QoL have established reliability and validity, many alcohol-specific measures of QoL have not yet been validated. Nevertheless, QoL has been shown to be significantly impaired in those with alcohol abuse and dependence, particularly in the domains of mental health and social functioning, the very areas that show the greatest improvement with abstinence and its maintenance. Moreover, the literature demonstrates the utility of using QoL measures throughout assessment and treatment as a motivational tool and as a marker for treatment efficacy.
Measuring and monitoring QoL during assessment and treatment can add important value to patient recovery, for QoL improves with treatment and successful abstinence. Therefore, targeted, disease-specific assessments of QoL are warranted to address the impairments in the physical, mental, and social domains in alcohol abuse and dependence, thereby improving long-term outcomes.
在参与本次教育活动后,读者应能够更好地识别目前用于测量酒精滥用和依赖患者生活质量(QoL)的工具;确定酒精滥用和依赖对 QoL 的影响;以及评估治疗酒精滥用和依赖对 QoL 的影响。
生活质量包括生理、心理和社会领域,已被证明受到酒精滥用和依赖的负面影响。本综述旨在通过审查用于测量 QoL 的工具,并通过分析酒精滥用和依赖及其治疗对 QoL 的影响,来研究酒精滥用和依赖患者的 QoL。
使用数据库搜索 PubMed 和 PsycINFO 中的文献,时间跨度为过去 40 年(1971-2011 年),使用以下关键词:滥用或依赖、使用和酒精、生活质量、QoL、健康相关生活质量、HRQOL。两位作者独立地对符合特定选择标准的 50 项研究达成一致,认为这些研究应被纳入。
尽管有几种全球 QoL 综合测量工具已经确立了可靠性和有效性,但许多酒精特异性 QoL 测量工具尚未得到验证。然而,酒精滥用和依赖患者的 QoL 显著受损,特别是在心理健康和社会功能领域,而这些领域在戒断及其维持方面显示出最大的改善。此外,文献证明在评估和治疗过程中使用 QoL 测量作为动机工具和治疗效果的标志物是有效的。
在评估和治疗期间测量和监测 QoL 可以为患者的康复增加重要价值,因为 QoL 在治疗和成功戒断后会得到改善。因此,需要进行有针对性的、特定于疾病的 QoL 评估,以解决酒精滥用和依赖患者在生理、心理和社会领域的损伤,从而改善长期结局。