Bratland-Sanda Solfrid, Sundgot-Borgen Jorunn, Myklebust Grethe
a Department of Sport and Outdoor Life Studies , Telemark University College , Bø i Telemark , Norway.
b Oslo Sport Trauma Research Center, Department of Sports Medicine , Norwegian School of Sport Sciences , Oslo , Norway.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(8):784-92. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2015.1062564. Epub 2015 Aug 9.
To examine the prevalence and factors associated with instruction-related injuries and musculoskeletal pain among group fitness instructors.
Descriptive epidemiology study.
Online survey.
Group fitness instructors from three fitness centre companies in Norway (n = 1473). Assessment of independent variables: questions regarding duration of working as a group fitness instructor, weekly instruction and exercise loading and modality, instruction-related injuries, musculoskeletal pain, use of alcohol, tobacco, snuff, menstrual dysfunction and disordered eating (Eating Disorder Inventory, EDI). The respondents were divided into high instruction loading (HIL), ≥5 h/w with instruction; and low instruction loading (LIL), <5 h/w with instruction).
The response rate was 57% (n = 837). Mean total loading (instruction and exercise) was 11.8 h/w and 6.3 h/w in the HIL and LIL groups (p < .001), respectively. The prevalence of acute (9% vs. 6%, p < .05), overuse (38% vs. 24%, p < .001) and both acute and overuse injuries (25% vs. 10%, p < .001) was higher in the HIL than in the LIL group (OR: 3.9, CI: 2.7, 5.5). The most prevalent injury locations were ankle and lower leg. The most frequent location for musculoskeletal pain was the shoulder/neck region. Factors associated with injury were instruction loading (h/w), years working as an instructor and EDI score. A high total EDI score predicted musculoskeletal pain.
The high prevalence of injuries and musculoskeletal pain suggests a need for prevention strategies in the fitness industry. There is a need for limits regarding weekly instruction loading, especially for classes with high metabolic and/or mechanical loading.
研究团体健身教练中与教学相关损伤及肌肉骨骼疼痛的患病率及相关因素。
描述性流行病学研究。
在线调查。
来自挪威三家健身中心公司的团体健身教练(n = 1473)。自变量评估:关于担任团体健身教练的工作时长、每周教学和锻炼负荷及方式、与教学相关的损伤、肌肉骨骼疼痛、酒精、烟草、鼻烟的使用、月经功能障碍和饮食失调(饮食失调量表,EDI)的问题。受访者分为高教学负荷(HIL)组,每周教学时长≥5小时;低教学负荷(LIL)组,每周教学时长<5小时。
回复率为57%(n = 837)。HIL组和LIL组的平均总负荷(教学和锻炼)分别为每周11.8小时和6.3小时(p <.001)。HIL组急性损伤(9%对6%,p <.05)患病率、过度使用损伤(38%对24%,p <.001)患病率以及急性和过度使用损伤均有的情况(25%对10%,p <.001)均高于LIL组(比值比:3.9,置信区间:2.7,5.5)。最常见的损伤部位是脚踝和小腿。肌肉骨骼疼痛最常见的部位是肩部/颈部区域。与损伤相关的因素有教学负荷(小时/周)、担任教练的年限和EDI评分。EDI总分高预示着肌肉骨骼疼痛。
损伤和肌肉骨骼疼痛的高患病率表明健身行业需要预防策略。需要对每周教学负荷加以限制,尤其是对于代谢和/或机械负荷高的课程。