Koch Markus, Schulz Johannes, Edgecombe Gregory D
Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, University of Bonn, An der Immenburg 1, 53121 Bonn, Germany.
Department of Entomology, Biocentre Grindel and Zoological Museum, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Zookeys. 2015 Jun 30(510):243-67. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.510.8840. eCollection 2015.
Mandibular mechanisms in Geophilomorpha are revised based on three-dimensional reconstructions of the mandibulo-tentorial complex and its muscular equipment in Dicellophiluscarniolensis (Placodesmata) and Hydroschendylasubmarina (Adesmata). Tentorial structure compares closely in the two species and homologies can be proposed for the 14/17 muscles that attach to the tentorium. Both species retain homologues of muscles that in other Pleurostigmophora are traditionally thought to cause swinging movements of the tentorium that complement the mobility of the mandibles. Although the original set of tentorial muscles is simplified in Geophilomorpha, the arrangement of the preserved homologues conforms to a system of six degrees of freedom of movement, as in non-geophilomorph Pleurostigmophora. A simplification of the mandibular muscles is confirmed for Geophilomorpha, but our results reject absence of muscles that in other Pleurostigmophora primarily support see-saw movements of the mandibles. In the construction of the tentorium, paralabial sclerites seem to be involved in neither Placodesmata nor Adesmata, and we propose their loss in Geophilomorpha as a whole. Current insights on the tentorial skeleton and its musculature permit two alternative conclusions on their transformation in Geophilomorpha: either tentorial mobility is primarily maintained in both Placodesmata and Adesmata (contrary to Manton's arguments for immobility), or the traditional assumption of the tentorium as being mobile is a misinterpretation for Pleurostigmophora as a whole.
基于对肉食双盘丝蚓(Placodesmata)和滨海水蜈蚣(Adesmata)的下颌-幕骨复合体及其肌肉结构的三维重建,对土蜈蚣目的下颌机制进行了修订。两种物种的幕骨结构非常相似,可以为附着在幕骨上的14/17块肌肉提出同源性。这两个物种都保留了一些肌肉的同源物,在其他侧气门亚纲动物中,这些肌肉传统上被认为会引起幕骨的摆动运动,以补充下颌的活动能力。虽然土蜈蚣目的原始幕骨肌肉组简化了,但保留的同源物的排列符合六自由度运动系统,就像非土蜈蚣目的侧气门亚纲动物一样。已证实土蜈蚣目的下颌肌肉有所简化,但我们的结果否定了其他侧气门亚纲动物中主要支持下颌跷跷板运动的肌肉不存在的观点。在幕骨的构造中,唇旁骨片似乎在Placodesmata和Adesmata中都没有参与,我们认为它们在整个土蜈蚣目中已经消失。目前对幕骨骨骼及其肌肉组织的见解允许对它们在土蜈蚣目中的转变得出两种不同的结论:要么幕骨的活动性在Placodesmata和Adesmata中都主要得以保留(与曼顿关于不活动的观点相反),要么将幕骨视为可活动的传统假设对整个侧气门亚纲动物来说是一种误解。