• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉和听觉呈现中的操作手势效应:感知和运动任务中工具之间的联系。

Manipulation gesture effect in visual and auditory presentations: the link between tools in perceptual and motor tasks.

作者信息

Rey Amandine E, Roche Kévin, Versace Rémy, Chainay Hanna

机构信息

Laboratoire d'Etude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université Lumière Lyon 2 Lyon, France.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 22;6:1031. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01031. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01031
PMID:26257687
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4510311/
Abstract

There is much behavioral and neurophysiological evidence in support of the idea that seeing a tool activates motor components of action related to the perceived object (e.g., grasping, use manipulation). However, the question remains as to whether the processing of the motor components associated with the tool is automatic or depends on the situation, including the task and the modality of tool presentation. The present study investigated whether the activation of motor components involved in tool use in response to the simple perception of a tool is influenced by the link between prime and target tools, as well as by the modality of presentation, in perceptual or motor tasks. To explore this issue, we manipulated the similarity of gesture involved in the use of the prime and target (identical, similar, different) with two tool presentation modalities of the presentation tool (visual or auditory) in perceptual and motor tasks. Across the experiments, we also manipulated the relevance of the prime (i.e., associated or not with the current task). The participants saw a first tool (or heard the sound it makes), which was immediately followed by a second tool on which they had to perform a perceptual task (i.e., indicate whether the second tool was identical to or different from the first tool) or a motor task (i.e., manipulate the second tool as if it were the first tool). In both tasks, the similarity between the gestures employed for the first and the second tool was manipulated (Identical, Similar or Different gestures). The results showed that responses were faster when the manipulation gestures for the two tools were identical or similar, but only in the motor task. This effect was observed irrespective of the modality of presentation of the first tool, i.e., visual or auditory. We suggest that the influence of manipulation gesture on response time depends on the relevance of the first tool in motor tasks. We discuss these motor activation results in terms of the relevance and demands of the tasks.

摘要

有许多行为和神经生理学证据支持这样一种观点,即看到工具会激活与所感知物体相关的动作的运动成分(例如抓握、使用操作)。然而,与工具相关的运动成分的处理是自动的还是取决于情境,包括任务和工具呈现的方式,这个问题仍然存在。本研究调查了在感知或运动任务中,对工具的简单感知所引发的工具使用中涉及的运动成分的激活是否受到启动工具和目标工具之间的联系以及呈现方式的影响。为了探究这个问题,我们在感知和运动任务中,通过两种工具呈现方式(视觉或听觉),操纵了启动工具和目标工具使用中涉及的手势的相似性(相同、相似、不同)。在整个实验中,我们还操纵了启动工具的相关性(即与当前任务相关或不相关)。参与者看到第一个工具(或听到它发出的声音),随后立即看到第二个工具,他们必须对第二个工具执行感知任务(即指出第二个工具与第一个工具是否相同)或运动任务(即像使用第一个工具一样操作第二个工具)。在这两个任务中,都操纵了用于第一个和第二个工具的手势之间的相似性(相同、相似或不同的手势)。结果表明,当两个工具的操作手势相同或相似时,反应更快,但仅在运动任务中如此。无论第一个工具的呈现方式是视觉还是听觉,都观察到了这种效应。我们认为,操作手势对反应时间的影响取决于第一个工具在运动任务中的相关性。我们根据任务的相关性和要求来讨论这些运动激活结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2866/4510311/466f6dc86b8b/fpsyg-06-01031-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2866/4510311/ef24ce74df03/fpsyg-06-01031-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2866/4510311/ea648f931e50/fpsyg-06-01031-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2866/4510311/60134cd4c1f5/fpsyg-06-01031-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2866/4510311/466f6dc86b8b/fpsyg-06-01031-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2866/4510311/ef24ce74df03/fpsyg-06-01031-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2866/4510311/ea648f931e50/fpsyg-06-01031-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2866/4510311/60134cd4c1f5/fpsyg-06-01031-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2866/4510311/466f6dc86b8b/fpsyg-06-01031-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Manipulation gesture effect in visual and auditory presentations: the link between tools in perceptual and motor tasks.视觉和听觉呈现中的操作手势效应:感知和运动任务中工具之间的联系。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 22;6:1031. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01031. eCollection 2015.
2
Gesture and word analysis: the same or different processes?手势和词语分析:相同还是不同的过程?
Neuroimage. 2015 Aug 15;117:375-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.080. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
3
Manual directional gestures facilitate cross-modal perceptual learning.手动定向手势促进跨模态感知学习。
Cognition. 2019 Jun;187:178-187. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
4
Action-Related Speech Modulates Beta Oscillations During Observation of Tool-Use Gestures.与动作相关的言语在观察工具使用手势时调节β振荡。
Brain Topogr. 2018 Sep;31(5):838-847. doi: 10.1007/s10548-018-0641-z. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
5
Manual Gestures Modulate Early Neural Responses in Loudness Perception.手部动作调节响度感知中的早期神经反应。
Front Neurosci. 2021 Sep 1;15:634967. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.634967. eCollection 2021.
6
The modality-switch effect: visually and aurally presented prime sentences activate our senses.模态转换效应:视觉和听觉呈现的启动句会激活我们的感官。
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 30;6:1668. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01668. eCollection 2015.
7
A comparison of visuomotor cue integration strategies for object placement and prehension.用于物体放置和抓握的视觉运动线索整合策略的比较。
Vis Neurosci. 2009 Jan-Feb;26(1):63-72. doi: 10.1017/S0952523808080668. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
8
Beyond words: evidence for automatic language-gesture integration of symbolic gestures but not dynamic landscapes.言外之意:象征性手势而非动态场景存在自动语言 - 手势整合的证据。
Psychol Res. 2014 Jan;78(1):55-69. doi: 10.1007/s00426-012-0475-3. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
9
Knowing how to do it or doing it? A double dissociation between tool-gesture production and tool-gesture knowledge.知道怎么做还是实际在做?工具手势产生与工具手势知识之间的双重分离。
Cortex. 2021 Aug;141:449-464. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 May 28.
10
Gesture's body orientation modulates the N400 for visual sentences primed by gestures.手势的身体朝向调节了视觉句子的 N400,这些句子是由手势预先启动的。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Dec;41(17):4901-4911. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25166. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

本文引用的文献

1
When Action Observation Facilitates Visual Perception: Activation in Visuo-Motor Areas Contributes to Object Recognition.当动作观察促进视觉感知时:视觉运动区域的激活有助于物体识别。
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Sep;25(9):2907-18. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu087. Epub 2014 May 2.
2
Pointing treatments are task relevant: a visuomotor priming study.指向性治疗与任务相关:一项视觉运动启动研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 28;9(4):e96154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096154. eCollection 2014.
3
What neuropsychology tells us about human tool use? The four constraints theory (4CT): mechanics, space, time, and effort.
神经心理学告诉了我们关于人类工具使用的什么?四项约束理论(4CT):力学、空间、时间和努力。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2014 Jun;24(2):88-115. doi: 10.1007/s11065-014-9260-y. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
4
Effects of motor congruence on visual working memory.运动一致性对视觉工作记忆的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Oct;76(7):2063-70. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0654-y.
5
Unconscious automatic brain activation of acoustic and action-related conceptual features during masked repetition priming.掩蔽重复启动过程中无意识自动的大脑对声音和动作相关概念特征的激活。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Feb;26(2):352-64. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00473. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
6
Are tool properties always processed automatically? The role of tool use context and task complexity.工具属性是否总是自动处理?工具使用情境和任务复杂性的作用。
Cortex. 2013 Jun;49(6):1679-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.08.016. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
7
What is in a tool concept? Dissociating manipulation knowledge from function knowledge.工具概念包含什么?从功能知识中分离出操作知识。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Nov;40(8):1303-13. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0236-y.
8
Two action systems in the human brain.人类大脑中的两个动作系统。
Brain Lang. 2013 Nov;127(2):222-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
9
One hand, two objects: emergence of affordance in contexts.一只手,两个物体:语境中凸显功能的出现。
Brain Cogn. 2012 Oct;80(1):64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 May 25.
10
No role for motor affordances in visual working memory.运动启发在视觉工作记忆中不起作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jan;39(1):2-13. doi: 10.1037/a0028642. Epub 2012 May 21.