Eghbali-Babadi Maryam, Ghadiriyan Raziyeh, Hosseini Sayed Mohsen
Hypertension Research Center, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Institute, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Student Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2015 Jul-Aug;20(4):496-501. doi: 10.4103/1735-9066.161006.
Despite advances in the field of intravenous therapy, phlebitis is still a common complication of peripheral venous catheter and finding an appropriate solution to prevent and reduce the incidence of this complication remains challenging. One of the methods used in reducing the incidence of phlebitis is the use of saline lock, which is forgotten in most hospitals. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate its impact on the incidence and severity of phlebitis.
In a single-blind (the researcher) clinical trial, 88 patients with peripheral venous catheter admitted in cardiac care units in selected hospitals of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran, were selected through convenient sampling method. They were randomly divided into two groups of intervention and control groups using random number table. The intervention group received 3 ml of 0.9% normal saline sterilized before and after each intravenous drug or every 12 h. However, in the control group, the intravenous drugs were given as routine and saline lock was not used. The evaluation of intravenous catheter regarding the incidence of phlebitis and its degrees using Jackson's Visual Infusion Phlebitis Scale was performed 6 times within 72 h (every 12 h). Results were evaluated by SPSS software using descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, t-test, and Mann-Whitney test.
Results showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the degree of phlebitis (P = 0.003). The percentage of phlebitis incidence in the control group was 88.6% and in the intervention group was 43.2%. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001). The risk of incidence of phlebitis in the group without saline lock (control), compared to the intervention group, was 10.3 times greater (CI = 95%). The incidence of phlebitis in both groups increased with increase in the duration of catheter placement.
The results of this study showed that the use of saline lock in the intervention group compared to the control group, in which saline lock was not used, can have a significant impact on reducing the incidence of phlebitis and its degree.
尽管静脉治疗领域取得了进展,但静脉炎仍是外周静脉导管常见的并发症,找到预防和降低该并发症发生率的合适解决方案仍然具有挑战性。减少静脉炎发生率的方法之一是使用生理盐水封管,但在大多数医院中这一点被忽视了。因此,本研究旨在评估其对静脉炎发生率和严重程度的影响。
在一项单盲(研究者)临床试验中,通过方便抽样法选取了伊朗伊斯法罕医科大学选定医院心脏监护病房的88例外周静脉置管患者。使用随机数字表将他们随机分为干预组和对照组。干预组在每次静脉用药前后或每12小时接受3毫升经消毒的0.9%生理盐水封管。然而,对照组按常规给予静脉药物,不使用生理盐水封管。在72小时内(每12小时)使用杰克逊视觉静脉炎量表对静脉导管的静脉炎发生率及其程度进行6次评估。结果通过SPSS软件进行描述性统计、卡方检验、t检验和曼-惠特尼检验进行评估。
结果显示,两组在静脉炎程度方面存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.003)。对照组静脉炎发生率为88.6%,干预组为43.2%。两组之间存在统计学显著差异(P < 0.001)。与干预组相比,未使用生理盐水封管的组(对照组)静脉炎发生风险高10.3倍(置信区间 = 95%)。两组静脉炎发生率均随导管留置时间的增加而升高。
本研究结果表明,与未使用生理盐水封管的对照组相比,干预组使用生理盐水封管对降低静脉炎发生率及其程度有显著影响。