Suppr超能文献

确定TrueAllele®案例工作的限度:一项验证研究。

Establishing the Limits of TrueAllele® Casework: A Validation Study.

作者信息

Greenspoon Susan A, Schiermeier-Wood Lisa, Jenkins Brad C

机构信息

Virginia Department of Forensic Science, Richmond, VA, 23219.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 2015 Sep;60(5):1263-76. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12810. Epub 2015 Aug 10.

Abstract

The limits of the expert system, TrueAllele® Casework (TA), were explored using challenging mock casework profiles that included 17 single-source and 18 two-, 15 three- and 7 four-person DNA mixtures. The sensitivity (ability to detect a minor contributor) of the TA analysis process was examined by challenging the system with mixture DNA samples that exhibited allelic and locus dropout and other stochastic effects. The specificity (ability to exclude nondonors) was rigorously tested by interrogating TA derived genotypes with 100 nondonor profiles. The accuracy with which TA estimated mixture weights of contributors to the two-person mixtures was examined. Finally, first-degree relatives of donors were used to assess the ability of the system to exclude close relatives. TA demonstrated great accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. TA correctly assigned mixture weights and excluded nearly all first-degree relatives. This study demonstrates the analysis power of the TrueAllele® Casework system.

摘要

利用具有挑战性的模拟案件样本对专家系统TrueAllele®案例分析(TA)的局限性进行了探究,这些样本包括17个单源样本以及18个两人、15个三人与7个四人DNA混合样本。通过用表现出等位基因和基因座缺失以及其他随机效应的混合DNA样本对该系统进行挑战,检验了TA分析过程的灵敏度(检测次要贡献者的能力)。通过用100个非贡献者样本询问TA得出的基因型,对特异性(排除非贡献者的能力)进行了严格测试。研究了TA估计两人混合样本中贡献者混合权重的准确性。最后,使用贡献者的一级亲属来评估该系统排除近亲的能力。TA表现出了很高的准确性、灵敏度和特异性。TA正确分配了混合权重并排除了几乎所有一级亲属。本研究证明了TrueAllele®案例分析系统的分析能力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验